Does Displaying the Class Results Affect Student Discussion during Peer Instruction?

被引:40
作者
Perez, Kathryn E. [1 ]
Strauss, Eric A. [1 ]
Downey, Nicholas [1 ]
Galbraith, Anne [1 ]
Jeanne, Robert [2 ]
Cooper, Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biol, La Crosse, WI 54601 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
来源
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION | 2010年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
INTRODUCTORY BIOLOGY; MULTIPLE-CHOICE; TRUE-FALSE; PERFORMANCE; LECTURE; COURSES; EXPLANATIONS; CONFORMITY; ATTITUDES; TASK;
D O I
10.1187/cbe.09-11-0080
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The use of personal response systems, or clickers, is increasingly common in college classrooms. Although clickers can increase student engagement and discussion, their benefits also can be overstated. A common practice is to ask the class a question, display the responses, allow the students to discuss the question, and then collect the responses a second time. In an introductory biology course, we asked whether showing students the class responses to a question biased their second response. Some sections of the course displayed a bar graph of the student responses and others served as a control group in which discussion occurred without seeing the most common answer chosen by the class. If students saw the bar graph, they were 30% more likely to switch from a less common to the most common response. This trend was more pronounced in true/false questions (38%) than multiple-choice questions (28%). These results suggest that observing the most common response can bias a student's second vote on a question and may be misinterpreted as an increase in performance due to student discussion alone.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 140
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Allen Deborah, 2002, Cell Biol Educ, V1, P3, DOI 10.1187/cbe.02-04-0430
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SAS/STAT 9.1 Users Guide
[3]   Active Learning and Student-centered Pedagogy Improve Student Attitudes and Performance in Introductory Biology [J].
Armbruster, Peter ;
Patel, Maya ;
Johnson, Erika ;
Weiss, Martha .
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2009, 8 (03) :203-213
[4]  
Armstrong Norris, 2007, CBE Life Sci Educ, V6, P163
[5]  
Asch SE., 1951, GROUPS LEADERSHIP ME, P295
[6]   The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence [J].
Baron, RS ;
Vandello, JA ;
Brunsman, B .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (05) :915-927
[7]  
BEATTY I, 2004, TRANSFORMING STUDENT, P1
[8]   Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) Line judgment task [J].
Bond, R ;
Smith, PB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 119 (01) :111-137
[9]  
Bransford John, 2000, PEOPLE LEARN BRAIN M
[10]  
Caldwell Jane E, 2007, CBE Life Sci Educ, V6, P9, DOI 10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205