Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004

被引:751
作者
Resnikoff, Serge [1 ]
Pascolinia, Donatella [1 ]
Mariott, SilVio P. [1 ]
Pokharel, Gopal P. [1 ]
机构
[1] WHO, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.2471/BLT.07.041210
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Estimates of the prevalence of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004 have been determined at regional and global levels for people aged 5 years and over from recent published and unpublished surveys. The estimates were based on the prevalence of visual acuity of less than 6/18 in the better eye with the currently available refractive correction that could be improved to equal to or better than 6/18 by refraction or pinhole. A total of 153 million people (range of uncertainty: 123 million to 184 million) are estimated to be visually impaired from uncorrected refractive errors, of whom eight million are blind. This cause of visual impairment has been overlooked in previous estimates that were based on best-corrected vision. Combined with the 161 million people visually impaired estimated in 2002 according to best-corrected vision, 314 million people are visually impaired from all causes: uncorrected refractive errors become the main cause of low vision and the second cause of blindness. Uncorrected refractive errors can hamper performance at school, reduce employability and productivity, and generally impair quality of life. Yet the correction of refractive errors with appropriate spectacles is among the most cost-effective interventions in eye health care. The results presented in this paper help to unearth a formerly hidden problem of public health dimensions and promote policy development and implementation, programmatic decision-making and corrective interventions, as well as stimulate research.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 70
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, PREV BLINDN DEAFN
[2]   Prevalence of refractive error in Bangladeshi adults - results of the National Blindness and Low Vision Survey of Bangladesh [J].
Bourne, RRA ;
Dineen, BP ;
Ali, SM ;
Huq, DMN ;
Johnson, GJ .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 111 (06) :1150-1160
[3]  
Dandona R, 2001, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V79, P237
[4]  
Khan RB, 2002, NEURO-ONCOLOGY, V4, P39, DOI 10.1093/neuonc/4.1.39
[5]   Rapid assessment of prevalence of cataract blindness at district level [J].
Limburg, H ;
Kumar, R ;
Indrayan, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 26 (05) :1049-1054
[6]  
MURRAY CJL, 1996, GLOBAL BURDEN DIS, V1
[7]  
MURTHY GVS, 2002, NAT SURV BLINDN VIS
[8]   Refractive Error Study in Children: Sampling and measurement methods for a multi-country survey [J].
Negrel, AD ;
Maul, E ;
Pokharel, GP ;
Zhao, JL ;
Ellwein, LB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 129 (04) :421-426
[9]   2002 global update of available data on visual impairment:: a compilation of population-based prevalence studies [J].
Pascolini, D ;
Mariotti, SP ;
Pokharel, GP ;
Pararajasegaram, R ;
Etya'ale, D ;
Négrel, AD ;
Resnikoff, S .
OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 11 (02) :67-115
[10]   Baltimore Vision Screening Project - Phase 2 [J].
Preslan, MW ;
Novak, A .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (01) :150-153