Comparison of dynamic sonography to stress radiography for assessing glenohumeral laxity in asymptomatic shoulders

被引:35
作者
Borsa, PA
Jacobson, JA
Scibek, JS
Dover, GC
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Sports Med Res Lab, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
shoulder; translation; ultrasound; radiography; ligament;
D O I
10.1177/0363546504269940
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Stress radiography has been the established imaging method for quantifying glenohumeral joint laxity. Dynamic ultrasound is an alternative imaging method that may be used to measure glenohumeral laxity; however, validity and repeatability have not been examined. Objective: To determine criterion-related validity and repeatability of a sonographic imaging method for measuring glenohumeral laxity in asymptomatic shoulders. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In experiment 1, 20 subjects were assessed for glenohumeral laxity using stress radiography and dynamic ultrasound. In the second experiment, 13 subjects were assessed for laxity in 2 separate test sessions using the dynamic ultrasound technique. Results: Correlational analysis between the sonographic and radiographic measures revealed an r = 0.79 (r(2) = 0.62), indicating excellent criterion-related validity for the sonographic imaging method. Test-retest repeatability was 0.72 and 0.85 for anterior and posterior translation, respectively, and interrater repeatability was 0.96 and 0.99 for anterior and posterior translation, respectively. Conclusions: Dynamic ultrasound appears to be a valid and repeatable method for assessing glenohumeral laxity in a clinical setting. Clinical Relevance: Based on the results of this study, dynamic ultrasound is a repeatable and valid method for measuring glenohumeral laxity and therefore may be used as a viable replacement for stress radiography during assessments of glenohumeral laxity.
引用
收藏
页码:734 / 741
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
AN KN, 1993, SHOULDER BALANCE MOB, P349
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   Radiographic evaluation of glenohumeral kinematics: A muscle fatigue model [J].
Chen, SK ;
Simonian, PT ;
Wickiewicz, TL ;
Otis, JC ;
Warren, RF .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 1999, 8 (01) :49-52
[4]  
Court-Payen M, 1995, EUR J ULTRASOUND, V2, P283
[5]  
Denegar CR, 1993, J SPORT REHABIL, V2, P35, DOI DOI 10.1123/JSR.2.1.35
[6]  
Deutsch A, 1996, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, V5, P186, DOI 10.1016/S1058-2746(05)80004-7
[7]   Quantification of anterior translation of the humeral head in the throwing shoulder - Manual assessment versus stress radiography [J].
Ellenbecker, TS ;
Mattalino, AJ ;
Elam, E ;
Caplinger, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (02) :161-167
[8]   A statistics primer - Validity and reliability [J].
Greenfield, MLVH ;
Kuhn, JE ;
Wojtys, EM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (03) :483-485
[9]   NORMAL AND ABNORMAL MECHANICS OF THE GLENOHUMERAL JOINT IN THE HORIZONTAL PLANE [J].
HOWELL, SM ;
GALINAT, BJ ;
RENZI, AJ ;
MARONE, PJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1988, 70A (02) :227-232
[10]   ULTRASOUND EVALUATION OF GLENOHUMERAL TRANSLATION - NORMAL AND PATHOLOGICAL VALUES [J].
JEROSCH, J ;
MARQUARDT, M ;
WINKELMANN, W .
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 1991, 12 (01) :31-35