Comparative evaluation of two two-dimensional gel electrophoresis image analysis software applications using synovial fluids from patients with joint disease

被引:22
作者
Arora, PS
Yamagiwa, H
Srivastava, A
Bolander, ME
Sarkar, U
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Orthoped Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Niigata Univ, Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci, Dept Regenerat & Transplant Med, Div Orthopaed Surg, Niigata, Japan
关键词
two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2D-GE); PDQuest; progenesis; image analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s00776-004-0878-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The proteomic composition of synovial fluid (SF) may hold clues to understanding the molecular basis of arthritis. However. the highly viscous nature and proteomic complexity of SF present a challenge when analyzing results obtained by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2D-GE). Several software applications are available for analyzing 2D-GE images. Despite inherent strengths and weaknesses, no comparison between these applications has been reported using SF or any human fluid specimens. We evaluated two common software packages - PDQuest and Progenesis Workstation - for spot detection. matching, and quantitation of 2D-GE images of SF from four patients with arthritic disease. Initially, whole 2D-gel images were analyzed for spot detection. which suggested that PDQuest is more consistent than Progenesis; however, PDQuest appeared to require more user intervention than Progenesis. Subsequently, two small areas (spots well resolved and spots not well resolved) were selected from each gel image, which were analyzed by the software for spot detection, matching, volume, and resolution. These analyses suggest that both tools can quantify well-resolved spots relatively consistently when compared with manual spot detection (the "gold standard"). The "3D viewer" option offered by both tools enables correct spot identification and matching. The strengths and weaknesses of these computer tools can provide guidance in the choice of a particular workstation for identifying biomarkers of arthritis.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 166
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Berggren K, 2000, ELECTROPHORESIS, V21, P2509, DOI 10.1002/1522-2683(20000701)21:12<2509::AID-ELPS2509>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-9
[3]  
Harry JL, 2000, ELECTROPHORESIS, V21, P1071, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000401)21:6<1071::AID-ELPS1071>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-D
[5]  
Lopez MF, 2000, ELECTROPHORESIS, V21, P1082, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000401)21:6<1082::AID-ELPS1082>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-E
[7]  
Mahon P, 2001, ELECTROPHORESIS, V22, P2075, DOI 10.1002/1522-2683(200106)22:10<2075::AID-ELPS2075>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-C
[9]  
Nishihara JC, 2002, ELECTROPHORESIS, V23, P2203, DOI 10.1002/1522-2683(200207)23:14<2203::AID-ELPS2203>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-H