A theoretical basis for the environmental Kuznets curve

被引:147
作者
Dinda, S
机构
[1] Indian Stat Inst, Econ Res Unit, Kolkata 108, India
[2] SR Fatepuria Coll, Murshidabad, W Bengal, India
关键词
EKC; abatement activity; environmental quality; two-sector model; endogenous growth model;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.007
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper attempts to explain the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) or inverted U-shaped relationship between income and environmental degradation in the framework of endogenous growth model. Considering a closed economy, one part of capital is used for commodity production, which generates pollution that degrades existing environment, and the remaining part is used for abating pollution (i.e., upgrading environment). Sufficient abatement activity improves/restores environmental quality. A sufficient abatement activity (associated with commodity production) could only lead optimally towards steady state. The ratio of allocation of capital between two sectors (production and abatement) is fixed along the optimal path, but it varies along the non-optimal path that exists in the off-steady state. In the economy, allocation of capital for abatement activity varies over time. Thus, a change from insufficient to sufficient allocation of capital (i.e., investment) for abatement activity is the basis for an inverted U-shaped relationship between environmental quality and economic growth. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 413
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Aghion P., 1998, ENDOGENOUS GROWTH TH
[2]   A dynamic approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis [J].
Agras, J ;
Chapman, D .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 28 (02) :267-277
[3]   The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve [J].
Andreoni, J ;
Levinson, A .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2001, 80 (02) :269-286
[4]  
[Anonymous], MODELS EC GROWTH ENV
[6]  
Barro R., 1995, EC GROWTH
[8]   Information access, income distribution, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve [J].
Bimonte, S .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 41 (01) :145-156
[9]  
BOVENBERG AL, 1995, J PUBLIC ECON, V57, P369
[10]  
BROCK W. A., 2004, 200416 U WISC DEP EC