Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate - A randomized controlled trial

被引:968
作者
Zietman, AL [1 ]
DeSilvio, ML
Slater, JD
Rossi, CJ
Miller, DW
Adams, JA
Shipley, WU
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Loma Linda Univ, Med Ctr, Loma Linda, CA USA
[3] Amer Coll Radiol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Radiat Therapy Oncol Grp, Philadelphia, PA USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2005年 / 294卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.294.10.1233
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Clinically localized prostate cancer is very prevalent among US men, but recurrence after treatment with conventional radiation therapy is common. Objective To evaluate the hypothesis that increasing the radiation dose delivered to men with clinically localized prostate cancer improves disease outcome. Design, Setting, and Patients Randomized controlled trial of 393 patients with stage T1b through T2b prostate cancer and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels less than 15 ng/mL randomized between January 1996 and December 1999 and treated at 2 US academic institutions. Median age was 67 years and median PSA level was 6.3 ng/mL. Median follow-up was 5.5 (range, 1.2-8.2) years. Intervention Patients were randomized to receive external beam radiation to a total dose of either 70.2 Gy (conventional dose) or 79.2 Gy (high dose). This was delivered using a combination of conformal photon and proton beams. Main Outcome Measure Increasing PSA level (ie, biochemical failure) 5 years after treatment. Results The proportions of men free from biochemical failure at 5 years were 61.4% (95% confidence interval, 54.6%-68.3%) for conventional-dose and 80.4% (95% confidence interval, 74.7%-86.1%) for high-dose therapy (P<.001), a 49% reduction in the risk of failure. The advantage to high-dose therapy was observed in both the low-risk and the higher-risk subgroups (risk reduction, 51% [P<.001] and 44% [P=.03], respectively). There has been no significant difference in overall survival rates between the treatment groups. Only 1% of patients receiving conventional-dose and 2% receiving high-dose radiation experienced acute urinary or rectal morbidity of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 3 or greater. So far, only 2% and 1%, respectively, have experienced late morbidity of RTOG grade 3 or greater. Conclusions Men with clinically localized prostate cancer have a lower risk of biochemical failure if they receive high-dose rather than conventional-dose conformal radiation. This advantage was achieved without any associated increase in RTOG grade 3 acute or late urinary or rectal morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:1233 / 1239
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   The contemporary management of prostate cancer in the United States: Lessons from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE), a national disease registry [J].
Cooperberg, MR ;
Broering, JM ;
Litwin, MS ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Mehta, SS ;
Henning, JM ;
Carroll, PR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04) :1393-1401
[2]  
Cox JD, 1999, J CLIN ONCOL, V17, P1155
[3]  
Cox JD, 1997, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V37, P1035
[4]  
Crook JM, 1997, CANCER, V79, P81, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970101)79:1<81::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-2
[6]   Changing prostate-specific antigen outcome after surgery or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer during the prostate-specific antigen era [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Chen, MH ;
Oh-Ung, J ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Cote, K ;
Loffredo, M ;
Richie, JP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (02) :436-441
[7]   BIOPSY AFTER EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION-THERAPY FOR ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - CORRELATION WITH ORIGINAL HISTOLOGICAL GRADE AND CURRENT PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVELS [J].
DUGAN, TC ;
SHIPLEY, WU ;
YOUNG, RH ;
VERHEY, LJ ;
ALTHAUSEN, AF ;
HENEY, NM ;
MCMANUS, PL ;
ABRAHAM, EH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 146 (05) :1313-1316
[8]   The use of hormonal therapy with radiotherapy for prostate cancer: analysis of prospective randomised trials [J].
Gottschalk, AR ;
Roach, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 90 (05) :950-954
[9]   A CLASS OF K-SAMPLE TESTS FOR COMPARING THE CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE OF A COMPETING RISK [J].
GRAY, RJ .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1988, 16 (03) :1141-1154
[10]   A critical analysis of the interpretation of biochemical failure in surgically treated patients using the american society for therapeutic radiation and oncology criteria [J].
Gretzer, MB ;
Trock, BJ ;
Han, M ;
Walsh, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (04) :1419-1422