Ethics: "life before birth" and moral complexity in maternal-fetal surgery for spina bifida

被引:20
作者
Bliton, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Clin & Res Eth, Clin Eth Consultat Serv, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0095-5108(03)00046-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
This article considers the ethical significance of a moral belief common among pregnant women (and their partners) who seek open uterine repair for fetal spina, namely that their fetuses are already "babies." The need to recognize and interact sensitively with a pregnant woman's vulnerability to her own beliefs and concerns regarding potential disabilities, the fetal intervention, and its potential outcome is emphasized. Such recognition and explicit discussions are ethically important for informed consent and to safeguard against the judgments, enthusiasms, and biases of surgeons and other team members.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / +
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology
[2]   The case for and against intrauterine surgery for myelomeningoceles [J].
Bannister, CM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2000, 92 (01) :109-113
[3]  
BARCLAY WR, 1981, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V246, P1550
[4]  
BARCLAY WR, 1981, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V246, P1552
[5]   Can prenatal ultrasound findings predict ambulatory status in fetuses with open spina bifida? [J].
Biggio, JR ;
Owen, J ;
Wenstrom, KD ;
Oakes, WJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (05) :1016-1020
[6]   Strange, but not stranger: The peculiar visage of philosophy in clinical ethics consultation [J].
Bliton, MJ ;
Finder, SG .
HUMAN STUDIES, 1999, 22 (01) :69-97
[7]  
Bliton MJ, 2001, J CLIN ETHIC, V12, P346
[8]  
BLITON MJ, 2001, PHILOSOPHY MED SERIE, V68, P393
[9]   Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele and the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus [J].
Bruner, JP ;
Tulipan, N ;
Paschall, RL ;
Boehm, FH ;
Walsh, WF ;
Silva, SR ;
Hernanz-Schulman, M ;
Lowe, LH ;
Reed, GW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (19) :1819-1825
[10]   HOW TECHNOLOGY IS REFRAMING THE ABORTION DEBATE [J].
CALLAHAN, D .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1986, 16 (01) :33-42