A Randomized clinical trial testing treatment preference and two dietary options in Behavioral weight management: Preliminary results of the impact of diet at 6 months - PREFER study

被引:29
作者
Burke, Lora E.
Styn, Mindi A.
Steenkiste, Ann R.
Music, Edvin
Warziski, Melanie
Choo, Jina
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
关键词
weight loss; behavioral therapy; lacto-ovovegetarian; adherence; treatment preference;
D O I
10.1038/oby.2006.235
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The PREFER study objectives were to examine potential differences in weight loss during a standard behavioral intervention between subjects assigned to one of two calorie- and fat-restricted diets [standard behavior treatment (SBT) and lacto-ovo-vegetarian ([SBT+LOV)], with or without regard to their preferred dietary treatment. This article reports the differences in outcomes between diet groups after the first 6 months of the intervention. Research Methods and Procedures: The study used a fourgroup design. Subjects (n = 182) were randomized to a treatment preference group and then to a dietary treatment group. For this report, preference groups were combined to permit comparisons by dietary treatment only (SBT, n = 98; SBT+LOV, n = 84). Additional analyses compared SBT+LOV subjects who were 100% adherent (did not consume any meat, fish, or poultry, n = 47) to those who were < 100% adherent (n = 24). Results: Significant differences were seen in the baseline to 6-month change scores between the two groups for carbohydrate consumption (p = 0.013), protein consumption (p < 0.001), polyunsaturated-to-satfirated fat ratio (p = 0.009), and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level (p = 0.013). Among SBT+LOV subjects, those who were 100% adherent experienced greater reductions in weight (p < 0.001), total cholesterol (p = 0.026), LDL-C (p = 0.034), and glucose (p = 0.002) and consumed less fat (p = 0.030) compared with those who were < 100% adherent. Discussion: Differences between dietary treatment groups at 6 months were minimal, most likely because one-third of the SBT+LOV group did not follow the vegetarian diet and because both groups had the same calorie and fat restrictions. SBT+LOV subjects who were 100% adherent were more successful at both weight loss and cholesterol reduction than those who were < 100% adherent, suggesting that vegetarian diets are efficacious for weight and cholesterol control.
引用
收藏
页码:2007 / 2017
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1998, Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: The evidence report
  • [2] Barnard N D, 1995, Arch Fam Med, V4, P153, DOI 10.1001/archfami.4.2.153
  • [3] Effectiveness of a low-fat vegetarian diet in altering serum lipids in healthy premenopausal women
    Barnard, ND
    Scialli, AR
    Bertron, P
    Hurlock, D
    Edmonds, K
    Talev, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 85 (08) : 969 - 972
  • [4] FRIEDMAN LM, 1985, RANDOMIZATION PROCES
  • [5] The effect of a plant-based diet on plasma lipids in hypercholesterolemic adults - A randomized trial
    Gardner, CD
    Coulston, A
    Chatterjee, L
    Rigby, A
    Spiller, G
    Farquhar, JW
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 142 (09) : 725 - 733
  • [6] GOLDSTEIN DJ, 1992, INT J OBESITY, V16, P397
  • [7] NUTRIENT INTAKES AND EATING BEHAVIOR SCORES OF VEGETARIAN AND NONVEGETARIAN WOMEN
    JANELLE, KC
    BARR, SI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 1995, 95 (02) : 180 - &
  • [8] Long-term maintenance of weight loss: Current status
    Jeffery, RW
    Drewnowski, A
    Epstein, LH
    Stunkard, AJ
    Wilson, GT
    Wing, RR
    Hill, DR
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 19 (01) : 5 - 16
  • [9] Clinical implications of obesity with specific focus on cardiovascular disease - A statement for professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism - Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
    Klein, S
    Burke, LE
    Bray, GA
    Blair, S
    Allison, DB
    Pi-Sunyer, X
    Hong, YL
    Eckel, RH
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (18) : 2952 - 2967
  • [10] Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001
    Mokdad, AH
    Ford, ES
    Bowman, BA
    Dietz, WH
    Vinicor, F
    Bales, VS
    Marks, JS
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (01): : 76 - 79