Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation vs chemotherapy for children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

被引:20
作者
Sharathkumar, A
Saunders, EF
Dror, Y
Grant, R
Greenberg, M
Weitzman, S
Chan, H
Calderwood, S
Freedman, MH
Doyle, J
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children, Div Hematol Oncol, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[2] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Div Bone Marrow Transplantat, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
关键词
Philadelphia-positive (Ph+)ALL; children; allogeneic bone marrow transplantation;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bmt.1704319
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) with an MRD in complete remission (CR)1 is the preferred treatment for children with Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) ALL. The role of MUD BMT in CR1 is still controversial. We compared the outcomes of two treatment strategies: BMT using an MRD or MUD vs chemotherapy in children with Ph+ ALL in CR1. In total, 21 children were treated from 1985 to 2001. In all, 10 received chemotherapy and 11 received allogeneic BMT: four MRD, seven MUD. In the MRD group, one relapsed 12 months after BMT and died; the remaining three are long-term event-free survivors (median follow-up, 6.1 years). In the MUD group four died; the remaining three are long-term event-free survivors (median follow-up, 7.2 years). The 4-year event-free survival (EFS) for the BMT group was 53+/-15%. In the chemotherapy group, seven relapsed after a median period of 12.5 months and three remain in continuous CR (median follow-up, 2.4 years). Four chemotherapy patients received CR2 transplants; all died. The 4-year EFS for the chemotherapy and MUD groups was 33+/-17 and 35.7+/-20%, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant. We continue to support treating children with Ph+ ALL with MRD BMT in CR1. The effectiveness of MUD BMT vs chemotherapy merits further study.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 45
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Single-centre experience with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood: similar survival after matched-related and matched-unrelated donor transplants [J].
Al-Kasim, FA ;
Thornley, I ;
Rolland, M ;
Lau, W ;
Tsang, R ;
Freedman, MH ;
Saunders, EF ;
Calderwood, S ;
Doyle, JJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2002, 116 (02) :483-490
[2]   Outcome of treatment in children with philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia [J].
Aricò, M ;
Valsecchi, MG ;
Camitta, B ;
Schrappe, M ;
Chessells, J ;
Baruchel, A ;
Gaynon, P ;
Silverman, L ;
Janka-Schaub, G ;
Kamps, W ;
Pui, CH ;
Masera, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (14) :998-1006
[3]  
BARRETT AJ, 1992, BLOOD, V79, P3067
[4]   PROPOSALS FOR CLASSIFICATION OF ACUTE LEUKEMIAS [J].
BENNETT, JM ;
CATOVSKY, D ;
DANIEL, MT ;
FLANDRIN, G ;
GALTON, DAG ;
GRALNICK, HR ;
SULTAN, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1976, 33 (04) :451-&
[5]   PHILADELPHIA-CHROMOSOME-NEGATIVE PERIPHERAL-BLOOD STEM-CELLS CAN BE MOBILIZED IN THE EARLY PHASE OF RECOVERY AFTER A MYELOSUPPRESSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY IN PHILADELPHIA-CHROMOSOME-POSITIVE ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC-LEUKEMIA [J].
CARELLA, AM ;
FRASSONI, F ;
POLLICARDO, N ;
PUNGOLINO, E ;
FERRERO, R ;
VASALLO, F ;
SORACCO, M ;
GIORDANO, D ;
FIGARI, O ;
BENVENUTO, F ;
FLORIO, G ;
CARLIER, P ;
VALBONESI, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1995, 89 (03) :535-538
[6]  
CASPER J, 1992, BLOOD S, V80, pA65
[7]  
CHAN LC, 1985, LANCET, V1, P475
[8]   LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW RECIPIENTS FOR PHILADELPHIA-CHROMOSOME-POSITIVE ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC-LEUKEMIA [J].
CHAO, NJ ;
BLUME, KG ;
FORMAN, SJ ;
SNYDER, DS .
BLOOD, 1995, 85 (11) :3353-3354
[9]   Unrelated marrow transplantation for adult patients with poor-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia:: strong graft-versus-leukemia effect and risk factors determining outcome [J].
Cornelissen, JJ ;
Carston, M ;
Kollman, C ;
King, R ;
Dekker, AW ;
Löwenberg, B ;
Anasetti, C .
BLOOD, 2001, 97 (06) :1572-1577
[10]  
CRIST W, 1990, BLOOD, V76, P489