Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:167
作者
Bonilla, Luisa [1 ]
Ben-Aharon, Irit [1 ,4 ]
Vidal, Liat [2 ,4 ]
Gafter-Gvili, Anat [2 ,4 ]
Leibovici, Leonard [3 ,4 ]
Stemmer, Salomon M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rabin Med Ctr, Davidoff Ctr, Inst Oncol, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[2] Rabin Med Ctr, Davidoff Ctr, Inst Hematol, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[3] Rabin Med Ctr, Dept Med E, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[4] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2010年 / 102卷 / 24期
关键词
COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; PHASE-III TRIAL; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE C; PACLITAXEL; DOXORUBICIN; EPIRUBICIN; ANTHRACYCLINE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djq409
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background Dose-dense chemotherapy has become a mainstay regimen in the adjuvant setting for women with high-risk breast cancer. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing data from randomized controlled trials regarding the efficacy and toxicity of the dose-dense chemotherapy approach in nonmetastatic breast cancer. Methods Randomized controlled trials that compared a dose-dense chemotherapy protocol with a standard chemotherapy schedule in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting in adult women older than 18 years with breast cancer were identified by searching The Cochrane Cancer Network register of trials, The Cochrane Library, and LILACS and MEDLINE databases (from January 1966 to January 2010). Hazard ratios (HRs) of death and recurrence and relative risks of adverse events were estimated and pooled. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Ten trials met the inclusion criteria and were classified into two categories based on trial methodology. Three trials enrolling 3337 patients compared dose-dense chemotherapy with a conventional chemotherapy schedule (similar agents). Patients who received dose-dense chemotherapy had better overall survival (HR of death = 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.72 to 0.98, P = .03) and better disease-free survival (HR of recurrence or death = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.94, P = .005) than those on the conventional schedule. No benefit was observed in patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors. Seven trials enrolling 8652 patients compared dose-dense chemotherapy with regimens that use standard intervals but with different agents and/or dosages in the treatment arms. Similar results were obtained for these trials with respect to overall survival (HR of death = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.96, P = .01) and disease-free survival (HR of recurrence or death = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.88, P < .001). The rate of nonhematological adverse events was higher in the dose-dense chemotherapy arms than in the conventional chemotherapy arms. Conclusion Dose-dense chemotherapy results in better overall and disease-free survival, particularly in women with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. However, additional data from randomized controlled trials are needed before dose-dense chemotherapy can be considered as the standard of care.
引用
收藏
页码:1845 / 1854
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]
Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer [J].
Baldini, E ;
Gardin, G ;
Giannessi, PG ;
Evangelista, G ;
Roncella, M ;
Prochilo, T ;
Collecchi, P ;
Rosso, R ;
Lionetto, R ;
Bruzzi, P ;
Mosca, F ;
Conte, PF .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (02) :227-232
[3]
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[4]
The bigger the better? ... or what we know and what we still need to learn about anthracycline dose per course, dose density and cumulative dose in the treatment of breast cancer [J].
Biganzoli, L ;
Piccart, MJ .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 (12) :1177-1182
[5]
Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, and Fluorouracil Versus Dose-Dense Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel Versus Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel in Node-Positive or High-Risk Node-Negative Breast Cancer [J].
Burnell, Margot ;
Levine, Mark N. ;
Chapman, Judith-Anne W. ;
Bramwell, Vivien ;
Gelmon, Karen ;
Walley, Barbara ;
Vandenberg, Ted ;
Chalchal, Haji ;
Albain, Kathy S. ;
Perez, Edith A. ;
Rugo, Hope ;
Pritchard, Kathleen ;
O'Brien, Patti ;
Shepherd, Lois E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (01) :77-82
[6]
Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: First report of intergroup trial C9741/cancer and leukemia group B trial 9741 [J].
Citron, ML ;
Berry, DA ;
Cirrincione, C ;
Hudis, C ;
Winer, EP ;
Gradishar, WJ ;
Davidson, NE ;
Martino, S ;
Livingston, R ;
Ingle, JN ;
Perez, EA ;
Carpenter, J ;
Hurd, D ;
Holland, JF ;
Smith, BL ;
Sartor, CI ;
Leung, EH ;
Abrams, J ;
Schilsky, RL ;
Muss, HB ;
Norton, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (08) :1431-1439
[7]
METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[8]
Doorduijn JK, 2004, HAEMATOLOGICA, V89, P1109
[9]
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[10]
Ellis GK, 2006, J CLIN ONCOL, V24, p12S