Sewer and tank flushing for sediment, corrosion, and pollution control

被引:17
作者
Fan, CY [1 ]
Field, R
Pisano, WC
Barsanti, J
Joyce, JJ
Sorenson, H
机构
[1] US EPA, Natl Risk Mgmt Res Lab, Water Supply & Water Resour Div, Urban Wateshed Mgmt Branch, Edison, NJ 08837 USA
[2] Montgomery Watson, Boston, MA 02109 USA
[3] Odor & Corros Technol Consultants Inc, Houston, TX 77065 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE | 2001年 / 127卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:3(194)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents an overview of causes of sewer deterioration together with a discussion of control methods that can prevent or arrest this deterioration. In particular, this paper covers inline and combined sewer overflow storage tank flushing systems for removal of sediments and minimization of hydrogen sulfide production resulting in the reduction of associated pollution and sewerline corrosion. During low-flow dry-weather periods, sanitary wastewater solids deposited in combined sewer systems can generate hydrogen sulfide and methane gases due to anaerobic conditions. Sulfates are reduced to hydrogen sulfide gas that can then be oxidized to sulfuric acid on pipes and structure walls by further biochemical transformation. Furthermore, these solids deposits or sediments are discharged to the urban streams during storm events that can cause degradation of receiving-water quality. Thus, dry-weather sewer sedimentation not only creates hazardous conditions and sewer degradation but contributes significant pollutant loads to the urban receiving waters during wet-weather high-flow periods. Performance of two technologies [i.e., the tipping flusher and the flushing gate (FG)] was evaluated by a detailed examination of 18 facilities in Germany, Canada, and United States. As a result, both the tipping flusher and FG technology appear to be the most cost-effective means for flushing solids and debris from combined sewer overflow-storage tanks, while the FG is considered to be the most efficient method for flushing large diameter, flat sewers. In addition, capsulated reviews of several cost-effectiveness analyses are reported demonstrating the comparative benefits of flushing technology.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 201
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Ackers J. C., 1996, 141 CONSTR IND RES I
[2]  
[Anonymous], PROG WATER TECHNOL
[3]   Sediment transport in sewers - a step towards the design of sewers to control sediment problems [J].
Arthur, S ;
Ashley, R ;
Tait, S ;
Nalluri, C .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-WATER MARITIME AND ENERGY, 1999, 136 (01) :9-19
[4]   The influence of near bed solids transport on first foul flush in combined sewers [J].
Arthur, S ;
Ashley, RM .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 37 (01) :131-138
[5]  
ASHLEY RM, 1992, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V25, P1
[6]   Distribution of pollutant mass vs volume in stormwater discharges and the first flush phenomenon [J].
Bertrand-Krajewski, JL ;
Chebbo, G ;
Saget, A .
WATER RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (08) :2341-2356
[7]   SEPTICITY IN SEWERS - CAUSES, CONSEQUENCES AND CONTAINMENT [J].
BOON, AG .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 31 (07) :237-253
[8]  
*C BOG ASS, 1986, CIT EL NJ COMB SEW O
[9]   A NEWLY ISOLATED FUNGUS PARTICIPATES IN THE CORROSION OF CONCRETE SEWER PIPES [J].
CHO, KS ;
MORI, T .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 31 (07) :263-271
[10]   Analysis of concrete from corroded sewer pipe [J].
Davis, JL ;
Nica, D ;
Shields, K ;
Roberts, DJ .
INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 1998, 42 (01) :75-84