Does family still matter? Public and private transfers in emerging welfare state systems in a comparative perspective

被引:22
作者
Kim, Jin Wook [1 ]
Choi, Young Jun [2 ]
机构
[1] Sogang Univ, Dept Social Welf, Grad Sch Theol, Seoul 121742, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
private transfer; East Asian welfare model; Luxemburg Income Study; income inequality; poverty; family; KOREA; INEQUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00752.x
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
While the role of the family has been a distinctive feature of East Asian welfare systems, rapid social policy development and reforms in South Korea and Taiwan over the last two decades have led to an increase in public welfare. Yet, despite a growing number of studies, little is known about the role of family support - private transfers - and public programmes in the performance of state welfare. This article reports on a comparative analysis of the role of public and private transfers aimed at poverty and inequality reduction in 12 Western and two East Asian states employing the Luxemburg Income Study data set. Results indicate that, in contrast to the West, private transfers that rest primarily on family support remain more important than public transfers in reducing income inequality and poverty in South Korea and Taiwan.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 366
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Aghion Philippe., 1999, Growth, inequality, and globalization
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, INCOME DISTRIBUTION
[3]  
Biddlecom A. E., 2001, 0158 U MICH POP STUD
[4]  
CHAN HS, 2003, 092006 NAT POL FDN R
[5]  
CHOI K, 2003, FINAL REPORTS EADN R
[6]  
Choi YJ, 2008, POLICY POLIT, V36, P127
[7]   Transformations in economic security during old age in Korea: the implications for public-pension reform [J].
Choi, Young-Jun .
AGEING & SOCIETY, 2006, 26 :549-565
[8]  
Council for Economic Planning and Development, 2007, TAIW STAT DAT BOOK 2
[9]  
Cox D., 1990, World Bank Research Observer, V5, P205, DOI 10.1093/wbro/5.2.205
[10]  
COX D, 1987, J POLITICAL EC, V95, P1045