Comparison between the Matrix Pencil Method and the Fourier Transform Technique for high-resolution spectral estimation

被引：28

作者：

delRio, JEF

Sarkar, TK

机构：

[1] Dept. of Elec. and Comp. Engineering, 121 Link Hall, Syracuse University, Syracuse

来源：

DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING | 1996年 / 6卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1006/dspr.1996.0011

中图分类号：

TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];

学科分类号：

0808 ; 0809 ;

摘要：

The objective of this paper is to compare the performance of the Matrix Pencil Method, particularly the Total Forward-Backward Matrix Pencil Method, and the Fourier Transform Technique for high-resolution spectral estimation. Performance of each of the techniques, in terms of bias and variance, in the presence of noise is studied and the results are compared to those of the Cramer-Rao Bound. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc.

引用

页码：108 / 125

页数：18

共 17 条

[1]

Brennan L., 1961, IRE Trans. Antennas Propag., V9, P268, DOI [10.1109/TAP.1961.1145000, DOI 10.1109/TAP.1961.1145000]

[2]

CRAMER H, 1966, MATH METHODS STATIST

[3]

Golub G.H., 1985, MATRIX COMPUTATIONS

[4]

HARRIS FJ, 1978, P IEEE, V66, P51, DOI 10.1109/PROC.1978.10837

[5] MATRIX PENCIL METHOD FOR ESTIMATING PARAMETERS OF EXPONENTIALLY DAMPED UNDAMPED SINUSOIDS IN NOISE [J].

HUA, Y ;

SARKAR, TK .

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ACOUSTICS SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1990, 38 (05) :814-824

[6]

HUA Y, 1988, P ICASSP 88 NEW YORK, P2476

[7]

HUA Y, 1988, THESIS SYRACUSE U NE

[8] A NOTE ON THE CRAMER-RAO BOUND FOR 2-D DIRECTION FINDING BASED ON 2-D ARRAY [J].

HUA, YB ;

SARKAR, TK .

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1991, 39 (05) :1215-1218

[9]

*IMSL INC, 1984, PROBL SOLV SOFTW SYS

[10]

Johson D H, 1994, ARRAY SIGNAL PROCESS

← 1 2 →