Recruitment of participants for the Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis (ERA) trial: A comparison of costs, yields, and participant characteristics from community- and hospital-based recruitment strategies

This paper documents recruitment for the Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis trial, a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind angiographic trial of the effects of opposed and unopposed estrogen on coronary atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women (average scheduled duration of follow-up 3.2 years). We compare costs, yields, and participant characteristics between community-based and hospital-based recruitment strategies. We further compare community-based enriched sources (i.e., those that allowed self-selection or targeted women with known health characteristics) and nonenriched sources. Data gathered on potential participants include method of contact, clinical site, eligibility, completion of screening visits, and randomization rates. Demographic data on participants include age, race, education, marital status, and income. Self-reported health status, smoking status, lipid level, ejection fraction as well as history of chest pain, hypertension, and diabetes were recorded at baseline. Recruitment costswere estimated from employee salaries and costs of screening tests and procedures. Yields were compared by clinical site and by method of contact. Enriched sources of recruitment yielded higher percentages of enrolled participants than nonenriched sources. Both types of source resulted in demographically similar participants. Costs of community-based recruitment were Less than hospital-based recruitment; however, screening costs were higher. Overall, screening and recruitment averaged $2508 per randomized participant. (C) Elsevier Science Inc. 2001.