The limits of postmodernism in accounting history: The Decatur experience

被引：38

作者：

Arnold, PJ ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA

来源：

ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY | 1998年 / 23卷 / 07期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00021-4

中图分类号：

F8 [财政、金融];

学科分类号：

0202 ;

摘要：

This paper presents a response to Miller and O'Leary's (1994) study of the factory modernization at Caterpillar's Decatur plant and the role of accounting and other expertises in constituting subjectivities. The research draws extensively from interviews with workers in Caterpillar's Decatur plant to develop a defense of historical materialism against postmodern interpretations of managerial accounting practices that abandon the concepts of dass, ideology, and social structure. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：665 / 684

页数：20

共 53 条

[1]

Aglietta Michel., 1979, THEORY CAPITALIST RE

[2]

Ahmad Aijazuddin., 1992, In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures

[3]

[Anonymous], 1992, RELEVANCE REGAINED T

[4]

Armstrong P., 1994, CRIT PERSPECT, V5, P25, DOI DOI 10.1006/CPAC.1994.1003

[5] THE ROLE OF ACCOUNTING IN IDEOLOGICAL CONFLICT - LESSONS FROM THE SOUTH-AFRICAN DIVESTMENT MOVEMENT [J].

ARNOLD, P ;

HAMMOND, T .

ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 1994, 19 (02) :111-126

[6]

ARNOLD P, IN PRESS CRITICAL PE

[7]

Boyer R., 1990, REGULATION SCH

[8]

Braverman Harry., 1974, LABOR MONOPOLY CAPIT

[9]

BURAWOY M, 1979, MANUFACUTRING CONSEN

[10]

Burawoy M., 1985, POLITICS PRODUCTION

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →