Comparison of adaptive filtering techniques for land surface data assimilation

被引:50
作者
Crow, W. T. [1 ]
Reichle, R. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Hydrol & Remote Sensing Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
[2] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Goddard Earth Sci & Technol Ctr, Global Modeling & Assimilat Off, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2008WR006883
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The accurate specification of modeling and observational error information required by data assimilation algorithms is a major obstacle to the successful application of a land surface data assimilation system. The source and statistical structure of these errors are often unknown, and poor assumptions concerning the relative magnitude of modeling and observation uncertainty degrade the quality of land data assimilation products. In theory, adaptive filtering approaches are capable of estimating model and observation error covariance information during the online cycling of a data assimilation system. To date, however, these approaches have not been widely applied to land surface models. Here, we implement and compare four separate adaptive filtering schemes in a data assimilation system designed to ingest remotely sensed surface soil moisture retrievals. Upon testing of each scheme via a synthetic twin data assimilation experiment, three of the four adaptive approaches are found to provide substantially improved soil moisture estimates. However, the specific model and observation characteristics of satellite-based surface soil moisture retrievals contribute to the relatively slow convergence of all schemes. Overall, results highlight the need to consider unique aspects of the land data assimilation problem when designing and/or evaluating the relative performance of adaptive filtering algorithms.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1974, APPL OPTIMAL ESTIMAT
[2]  
Burgers G, 1998, MON WEATHER REV, V126, P1719, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1719:ASITEK>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   A STATISTICAL EXPLORATION OF THE RELATIONSHIPS OF SOIL-MOISTURE CHARACTERISTICS TO THE PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES OF SOILS [J].
COSBY, BJ ;
HORNBERGER, GM ;
CLAPP, RB ;
GINN, TR .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1984, 20 (06) :682-690
[5]   Estimating precipitation errors using spaceborne surface soil moisture retrievals [J].
Crow, W. T. ;
Bolten, J. D. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2007, 34 (08)
[6]   Monitoring root-zone soil moisture through the assimilation of a thermal remote sensing-based soil moisture proxy into a water balance model [J].
Crow, Wade T. ;
Kustas, William P. ;
Prueger, John H. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 112 (04) :1268-1281
[7]   Impact of incorrect model error assumptions on the sequential assimilation of remotely sensed surface soil moisture [J].
Crow, Wade T. ;
Van Loon, Emiel .
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2006, 7 (03) :421-432
[8]   The assimilation of remotely sensed soil brightness temperature imagery into a land surface model using Ensemble Kalman filtering: a case study based on ESTAR measurements during SGP97 [J].
Crow, WT ;
Wood, EF .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2003, 26 (02) :137-149
[9]  
DEE DP, 1995, MON WEATHER REV, V123, P1128, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<1128:OLEOEC>2.0.CO
[10]  
2