Memory performance, but not information processing speed, may be reduced during early pregnancy

被引:56
作者
de Groot, RHM
Hornstra, G
Roozendaal, N
Jolles, J
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Human Biol, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Nutr & Toxicol Res Inst Maastricht, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Psychiat & Neuropsychol, Div Cognit Disorders, Brain & Behav Inst, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1076/jcen.25.4.482.13871
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Several studies have investigated aspects of cognitive functioning during late pregnancy or in the period around delivery. The present paper describes a controlled study of neurocognitive functioning in an early phase of pregnancy (14 weeks). Seventy-one pregnant women and 57 control subjects matched for age and education were tested with a cognitive test battery. Intentional learning was tested with the Verbal Learning Test, retrieval from semantic memory with the Fluency Test, and speed of information processing with the Concept Shifting Test, the Stroop test, and the Letter Digit Substitution Test. Results show that performance on tests measuring intentional learning and retrieval from semantic memory were lower in the pregnant group during early pregnancy as compared to a closely matched nonpregnant group. In contrast, speed of information processing was not different between the two groups. The differences observed in memory performance were not large and further research is needed to establish their clinical significance. In addition, the results should be interpreted with care, because our study has a cross-sectional design, which has limitations concerning the fact that preexisting performance differences might be possible. Therefore, longitudinal studies are essential to ascertain clear associations between pregnancy and cognitive performance.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 488
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Al MDM, 2000, AM J CLIN NUTR, V71, p285S, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/71.1.285s
[2]  
[Anonymous], STANDAARDVRAGEN 1987
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1968, Learn Disord, DOI DOI 10.1080/13803390591004428
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Neuropsychological Assessment
[5]   DOCTOR AS MUM [J].
BAILDAM, E .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 303 (6799) :424-424
[6]   LEARNING AND RETRIEVAL RATE OF WORDS PRESENTED AUDITORILY AND VISUALLY [J].
BRAND, N ;
JOLLES, J .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 112 (02) :201-210
[7]   Motherhood and memory: a review [J].
Brett, M ;
Baxendale, S .
PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2001, 26 (04) :339-362
[8]   OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE MEMORY IMPAIRMENT IN PREGNANCY [J].
BRINDLE, PM ;
BROWN, MW ;
BROWN, J ;
GRIFFITH, HB ;
TURNER, GM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1991, 21 (03) :647-653
[9]  
Buckwalter JG, 1999, PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINO, V24, P69
[10]   Memory in pregnancy. II: Implicit, incidental, explicit, semantic, short-term working and prospective memory in primigravid, multigravid acid postpartum women [J].
Casey, P ;
Huntsdale, C ;
Angus, G ;
Janes, C .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 20 (03) :158-164