Comparison of batch-stirred and electro-spray reactors for biodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene in crude oil and hydrocarbon feedstocks

被引:28
作者
Kaufman, EN [1 ]
Harkins, JB [1 ]
Borole, AP [1 ]
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Chem Technol, Bioproc Res & Dev Ctr, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
关键词
oil desulfurization; Rhodococcus; electrostatic spraying; dibenzothiophene; biodesulfurization;
D O I
10.1007/BF02785650
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Biological removal of organic sulfur from petroleum feedstocks offers an attractive alternative to conventional thermochemical treatment, because of the mild operating conditions afforded by the biocatalyst. in order for biodesulfurization to realize commercial success, reactors must be designed that allow for sufficient liquid-liquid and gas-liquid mass transfer, while simultaneously reducing operating costs. Electro-spray bioreactors were investigated for use as desulfurization reactors because of their reported operational cost savings relative to mechanically agitated reactors. Unlike batch-stirred reactors, which mix the biocatalyst-containing aqueous phase with the organic feedstock by imparting momentum to the entire bulk solution, electro-spray reactors have the potential for tremendous cost savings, creating an emulsion <5 mu m in diameter, at a cost of only 3 W/L. Power law relationships indicate that mechanically stirred reactors would require 100-1000-fold more energy to create such a fine emulsion, but these relationships generally do not account for the effect of endogenously produced surfactant in the system. Here, the rates dibenzothiophene (DBT) oxidation to 2-hydroxybiphenyl (2-HBP) in hexadecane, by Rhodococcus sp IGTS8 are compared in the two reactor systems. Desulfurization rates ranged from 1.0 to 5.0 mg 2-HBP/(dry g cells.h), independent of the reactor employed. The batch-stirred reactor was capable of forming a very fine emulsion in the presence of the biocatalyst IGTS8, similar to that formed in the emulsion phase contactor (EPC(TM)), presumably because the biocatalyst produces its own Surfactant. Although EPC did not prove to be advantageous for the IGTS8 desulfurization system, it may prove advantageous for systems that do not produce surface-active bioagents, in addition to being mass-transport limited.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 144
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Almarsson O, 1996, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V49, P87, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960105)49:1<87::AID-BIT11>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-8
[3]  
BYERS CH, 1995, CHEM ENG PROG, V91, P63
[4]  
*CHEM, 1988, KINICS STATIC MIXERS, P32
[5]   DESULFURIZATION OF DIBENZOTHIOPHENE BY BACTERIA [J].
CONSTANTI, M ;
GIRALT, J ;
BORDONS, A .
WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1994, 10 (05) :510-516
[6]   CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DESULFURIZATION GENES FROM RHODOCOCCUS SP STRAIN IGTS8 [J].
DENOME, SA ;
OLDFIELD, C ;
NASH, LJ ;
YOUNG, KD .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 1994, 176 (21) :6707-6716
[7]  
DOUNIAS GA, 1995, EC FEASIBILITY BIOCH
[8]   ORGANIC SULFUR BIODESULFURIZATION IN NONAQUEOUS MEDIA [J].
FINNERTY, WR .
FUEL, 1993, 72 (12) :1631-1634
[9]  
FINNERTY WR, 1984, DEV IND MICROBIOL, V25, P31
[10]   Molecular mechanisms of biocatalytic desulfurization of fossil fuels [J].
Gray, KA ;
Pogrebinsky, OS ;
Mrachko, GT ;
Xi, L ;
Monticello, DJ ;
Squires, CH .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1996, 14 (13) :1705-1709