Second dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: questionnaire survey of health professionals

被引:54
作者
Petrovic, M [1 ]
Roberts, R
Ramsay, M
机构
[1] N Wales Hlth Author, Dept Publ Hlth, Mold, Flint, Wales
[2] Publ Hlth Lab Serv, Ctr Communicable Dis Surveillance, London NW9 5EQ, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.322.7278.82
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices among health professionals regarding the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, particularly the second dose. Design Self administered postal questionnaire survey. Setting North Wales Health Authority, 1998. Participants 148 health visitors, 239 practice nurses, and 206 general practitioners. Main outcome measures Respondents' views on MMR vaccination, including their views on the likelihood of an association with autism and Crohn's disease and on who is the best person to give advice to parents, whether they agree with the policy of a second dose of the vaccine, and how confident they are in explaining the rationale behind the second dose. Results Concerning the second dose of the vaccine, 48% of the professionals (220/460) had reservations and 3% (15) disagreed with the policy of giving it Over half the professionals nominated health visitors as the best initial source of advice on the second vaccine. 61% of health visitors (86/140), compared with 46% of general practitioners (73/158), reported feeling very confident about explaining the rationale of a two dose schedule to a well informed parent, but only 20% (28/138) would unequivocally recommend the second dose to a wavering parent 33% of the practice nurses (54/163) stated that the MMR vaccine was very likely or possibly associated with Crohn's disease and 27% (44/164) that it was associated with autism. Nearly a fifth of general practitioners (27/158) reported that they had not read the MMR section in the "green book," and 29% (44/152) reported that they had not received the Health Education Authority's factsheet on MMR immunisation. Conclusions Knowledge and practice among health professionals regarding the second dose of the MMR vaccine vary widely. Many professionals are not aware of or do not use the good written resources that exist, though local educational initiatives could remedy this.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 85
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EUR HLTH ALL SER
[2]  
*CDCP, 1998, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V47, P2
[3]  
*CDSC, 1998, COMMUN DIS REP CDR W, V8, P345
[4]   Vaccine adverse events: causal or coincidental? [J].
Chen, RT ;
DeStefano, F .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9103) :611-612
[5]   SUCCESSES AND FAILURES IN MEASLES CONTROL [J].
CUTTS, FT ;
MARKOWITZ, LE .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1994, 170 :S32-S41
[6]  
DEAN AG, 1995, EPI INFO VERS 6 WORD
[7]   A NEW METHOD FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS FROM DIPHTHERIA-TETANUS-PERTUSSIS AND MEASLES MUMPS RUBELLA VACCINES [J].
FARRINGTON, P ;
PUGH, S ;
COLVILLE, A ;
FLOWER, A ;
NASH, J ;
MORGANCAPNER, P ;
RUSH, M ;
MILLER, E .
LANCET, 1995, 345 (8949) :567-569
[8]   INTERPRETATION OF SEROLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE DATA FOR MEASLES USING MATHEMATICAL-MODELS - IMPLICATIONS FOR VACCINE STRATEGY [J].
GAY, NJ ;
HESKETH, LM ;
MORGANCAPNER, P ;
MILLER, E .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 1995, 115 (01) :139-156
[9]  
*HLTH ED AUTH, 1997, MMR IMM FACTSH
[10]  
HMSO, 1996, IMM INF DIS