Social and economic burden of mood disorders

被引:319
作者
Simon, GE [1 ]
机构
[1] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Ctr Hlth Studies, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
关键词
depression; bipolar disorder; disability; quality of life; health care cost; cost-effectiveness;
D O I
10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00420-7
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Social and economic effects of mood disorders include functional impairment, disability or lost work productivity, and increased use of health services. Evidence for these impacts includes cross-sectional studies, longitudinal studies, and true experiments (randomized trials of specific treatments or treatment programs). With respect to unipolar depression, strong evidence demonstrates that depression is associated with significant functional impairment and that effective treatment helps to restore function. Studies of the effect of depression on work disability and health care costs show strong cross-sectional associations (i.e., greater disability and higher costs among those with depression) and longitudinal associations (i.e., improvement in depression is associated with reduced disability and lower costs). All of these findings regarding unipolar depression seem as consistent in the subgroup of patients with comorbid chronic medical illness as in the total population with depressive disorders. Fewer data are available regarding social and economic burden of bipolar disorder, but available data show cross-sectional associations between mood symptoms and functional impairment, disability, and health care costs. Taken together, these data describe the substantial social and economic burden of mood disorders and the potential benefits of more effective treatment. We must recall, however, that economic benefits of treatment for mood disorders are secondary to the principal objective of relieving human suffering. (C) 2003 Society of Biological Psychiatry.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 215
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Determinants of disability in older coronary patients [J].
Ades, PA ;
Savage, PD ;
Tischler, MD ;
Poehlman, ET ;
Dee, J ;
Niggel, J .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 143 (01) :151-156
[2]   Treating depression in primary care in low-income women in Santiago, Chile: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Araya, R ;
Rojas, G ;
Fritsch, R ;
Gaete, J ;
Rojas, M ;
Simon, G ;
Peters, TJ .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9362) :995-1000
[3]   Health-related quality of life using the SF-36 in patients with bipolar disorder compared with patients with chronic back pain and the general population [J].
Arnold, LM ;
Witzeman, KA ;
Swank, ML ;
McElroy, SL ;
Keck, PE .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2000, 57 (1-3) :235-239
[4]   Determinants of functional outcome and healthcare costs in bipolar disorder: a high-intensity follow-up study [J].
Bauer, MS ;
Kirk, GF ;
Gavin, C ;
Williford, WO .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2001, 65 (03) :231-241
[6]   Depression and diabetes -: Impact of depression symptoms on adherence, function, costs [J].
Ciechanowski, PS ;
Katon, WJ ;
Russo, JE .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (21) :3278-3285
[7]   Treating depressed primary care patients improves their physical, mental, and social functioning [J].
Coulehan, JL ;
Schulberg, HC ;
Block, MR ;
Madonia, MJ ;
Rodriguez, E .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 157 (10) :1113-1120
[8]  
HAYS RD, 1995, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V52, P11
[9]  
Henk HJ, 1996, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V53, P899
[10]   Randomized trial of a depression management program in high utilizers of medical care [J].
Katzelnick, DJ ;
Simon, GE ;
Pearson, SD ;
Manning, WG ;
Helstad, CP ;
Henk, HJ ;
Cole, SM ;
Lin, EHB ;
Taylor, LH ;
Kobak, KA .
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2000, 9 (04) :345-351