Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory

被引:628
作者
Yonelinas, AP [1 ]
Otten, LJ
Shaw, KN
Rugg, MD
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] UCL, Inst Cognit Neurosci, London WC1E 6BT, England
[3] UCL, Dept Psychol, London WC1E 6BT, England
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Ctr Neurobiol Learning & Memory, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[5] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Neurobiol & Behav, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
cingulate; hippocampus; imaging; memory; parietal; prefrontal; recognition; temporal;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5295-04.2005
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The neural substrates of recognition memory retrieval were examined in a functional magnetic resonance imaging study designed to separate activity related to recollection from that related to continuous variations in familiarity. Across a variety of brain regions, the neural signature of recollection was found to be distinct from familiarity, demonstrating that recollection cannot be attributed to familiarity strength. In the prefrontal cortex, an anterior medial region was related to recollection, but lateral regions, including the anterior and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, were related to familiarity. Along the lateral parietal cortex, two functionally distinct regions were also observed: a lateral parietal/temporal region related to recollection and a more superior parietal region involved in familiarity. Similarly, in medial parietal regions, the posterior cingulate was related to recollection, whereas the precuneus was related to familiarity. The hippocampus was related to recollection, but also exhibited an inverse relationship to familiarity-driven recognition confidence. The results indicate that recollection and familiarity rely on different networks of brain regions and provide insights into the functional roles of different regions involved in episodic recognition memory.
引用
收藏
页码:3002 / 3008
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Aggleton JP, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P425
[2]   The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man [J].
Aguirre, GK ;
Detre, JA ;
Alsop, DC ;
DEsposito, M .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 1996, 6 (06) :823-829
[3]   Modeling geometric deformations in EPI time series [J].
Andersson, JLR ;
Hutton, C ;
Ashburner, J ;
Turner, R ;
Friston, K .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 13 (05) :903-919
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1944, TEACHERS WORD BOOK 3
[5]   Brain activity underlying encoding and retrieval of source memory [J].
Cansino, S ;
Maquet, P ;
Dolan, RJ ;
Rugg, MD .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2002, 12 (10) :1048-1056
[6]  
Cocosco Chris A., 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V5, P425
[7]   THE MRC PSYCHOLINGUISTIC DATABASE [J].
COLTHEART, M .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 33 (NOV) :497-505
[8]   Multiple routes to memory: Distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories [J].
Davachi, L ;
Mitchell, JP ;
Wagner, AD .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (04) :2157-2162
[9]   Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands [J].
Duncan, J ;
Owen, AM .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2000, 23 (10) :475-483
[10]   2 FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS OF THE HIPPOCAMPAL MEMORY SYSTEM [J].
EICHENBAUM, H ;
OTTO, T ;
COHEN, NJ .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1994, 17 (03) :449-472