Equity-efficiency trade-off in China's energy capping policy

被引:23
作者
Guo, Jin [1 ,4 ]
Du, Limin [2 ]
Wei, Chu [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Dev & Reform Commiss, Acad Macroecon Res, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, China Acad West Reg Dev, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Renmin Univ China, Sch Econ, Dept Energy Econ, 59 Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[4] Renmin Univ China, Natl Acad Dev & Strategy, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Equity; Efficiency; Trade-off; Energy cap; China; GLOBAL WARMING POLICY; EMISSIONS; ALLOCATION; ABATEMENT; SCHEME; DECENTRALIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As a part of the transition to a sustainable economy, China has set a cap on primary energy consumption for the first time, of 5.0 billion tonnes of standard coal equivalent by 2020. However, there is a debate on the cap feasibility and failure to adequately address the underlying equity-efficiency trade-off, which hampers achievement. This paper identifies some key challenges ahead, including the coal-dominant energy mix, declining financial support, inconsistent central-local goals, rising costs of energy-saving measures and quality of energy statistical data. By quantifying the preference of each providence toward equity-based or efficiency-based allocation schemes, the great disparity among provinces is revealed and the equity-efficiency trade-off relationship is confirmed. Developing regions, primarily located in central and western areas, tend to favor equity based disaggregating schemes. Contrarily, developed coastal provinces strongly favor efficiency-based schemes. The present national disaggregation schemes are mainly based on historical energy consumption, but disregard the provincial development gap and efficiency factors. We conclude that this ambitious goal is likely within reach, but increased efforts and flexible instruments are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 65
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, EN OUTL
[2]  
[Anonymous], STRAT ACT PLAN EN DE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, New York Times
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, CHIN STAT YB
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, KEY WORLD EN STAT
[6]  
Donaldson John., 2016, Assessing the Balance of Power in Central-local Relations in China
[7]   Estimating the Marginal Abatement Cost Curve of CO2 Emissions in China: Provincial Panel Data Analysis [J].
Du, Limin ;
Hanley, Aoife ;
Wei, Chu .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 48 :217-229
[8]   Economic development and carbon dioxide emissions in China: Provincial panel data analysis [J].
Du, Limin ;
Wei, Chu ;
Cai, Shenghua .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 23 (02) :371-384
[9]   The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Origins, Allocation, and Early Results [J].
Ellerman, A. Denny ;
Buchner, Barbara K. .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2007, 1 (01) :66-87
[10]  
Energy Information Administration, 2015, REC STAT REV SUGG HI