Feasibility and limits of caval-flow preservation during liver transplantation

被引:35
作者
Belghiti, J
Ettorre, GM
Durand, F
Sommacale, D
Sauvanet, A
Jerius, JT
Farges, O
机构
[1] Univ Paris 07, Beaujon Hosp, Dept Digest Surg, F-92118 Clichy, France
[2] Univ Paris 07, Beaujon Hosp, Transplantat Unit, F-92118 Clichy, France
关键词
D O I
10.1053/jlts.2001.28242
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
As promoters of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with preservation of caval flow, we reviewed our 8-year experience to assess the feasibility and limits of this technique. Preservation of caval flow during OLT, which improves intraoperative hemodynamic stability, was not considered feasible in a significant proportion of transplant recipients. When transient clamping of caval flow is required, causes and consequences of this clamping during all phases of the procedure were not reported. Between, 1991 and 1998, a total of 275 OLTs using a whole graft were performed in 259 patients with a policy consisting of a systematic attempt to preserve inferior vena cava (IVC) and caval flow. Preservation of IVC flow was possible in all cases, and no procedure was converted to the conventional technique. Caval flow was maintained throughout the procedure in 246 procedures (90%). Temporary IVC cross-clamping was required in 24 cases during hepatectomy because of difficult dissection and in 5 cases after graft reperfusion because of outflow obstruction; none required the use of a venovenous shunt. IVC cross-clamping during hepatectomy was required more frequently in cases of a large liver, with a mean duration of 11 +/- 4 minutes, but without significant influence on early postoperative risk, including one graft failure (4%) and one, postoperative death (4%). Conversely, IVC cross-clamping after reperfusion, with a mean duration of 23 +/- 5 minutes, was associated with four graft failures (80%) and four deaths (80%). We conclude that IVC preservation is feasible in almost all candidates, allowing the use of split livers from cadaveric or living donors independently from their underlying disease. Although preservation of caval flow was possible in the large majority of cases, transient IVC cross-damping during hepatectomy was well tolerated in contrast to caval damping after graft reperfusion. Therefore, if necessary, we recommend transient IVC cross-clamping to perform a large cavocaval anastomosis.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 987
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
BELGHITI J, 1992, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V175, P271
[2]   TRANSPLANTATION FOR FULMINANT AND SUBFULMINANT HEPATIC-FAILURE WITH PRESERVATION OF PORTAL AND CAVAL FLOW [J].
BELGHITI, J ;
NOUN, R ;
SAUVANET, A ;
DURAND, F ;
ASCHEHOUG, J ;
ERLINGER, S ;
BENHAMOU, JP ;
BERNUAU, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (07) :986-989
[3]   TEMPORARY PORTACAVAL ANASTOMOSIS WITH PRESERVATION OF CAVAL FLOW DURING ORTHOTOPIC LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION [J].
BELGHITI, J ;
NOUN, R ;
SAUVANET, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 169 (02) :277-279
[4]   Experience with the piggyback technique without caval occlusion in adult orthotopic liver transplantation [J].
Busque, S ;
Esquivel, CO ;
Concepcion, W ;
So, SKS .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 65 (01) :77-82
[5]   LIVER TRANSPLANTATION IN MAN .I. OBSERVATIONS ON TECHNIQUE AND ORGANIZATION IN 5 CASES [J].
CALNE, RY ;
WILLIAMS, R .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1968, 4 (5630) :535-+
[6]   ORTHOTOPIC LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION WITH PRESERVATION OF THE CAVAL AND PORTAL FLOWS - TECHNIQUE AND RESULTS IN 62 CASES [J].
CHERQUI, D ;
LAUZET, JY ;
ROTMAN, N ;
DUVOUX, C ;
DHUMEAUX, D ;
JULIEN, M ;
FAGNIEZ, PL .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1994, 58 (07) :793-796
[7]  
FIGUERAS J, 1993, TRANSPLANT P, V25, P2588
[8]   Piggy-back versus conventional technique in liver transplantation: Report of a randomized trial [J].
Jovine, E ;
Mazziotti, A ;
Grazi, GL ;
Ercolani, G ;
Masetti, M ;
Morganti, M ;
Pierangeli, F ;
Begliomini, B ;
Mazzetti, PG ;
Rossi, R ;
Paladini, R ;
Cavallari, A .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 10 (02) :109-112
[9]  
LERUT J, 1993, TRANSPLANT INT, V6, P299
[10]  
Lerut JP, 1997, TRANSPL INT, V10, P171