Quantification and rejection of ocular artifacts in auditory evoked fields in schizophrenics

被引:22
作者
Meier, T
Rosburg, T
Arnold, M
Kreitschmann-Andermahr, I
Sauer, H
Nowak, H
Witte, H
机构
[1] Univ Jena, Dept Psychiat, D-07740 Jena, Germany
[2] Univ Jena, Inst Med Stat Comp Sci & Documentat, D-07740 Jena, Germany
[3] Univ Jena, Dept Neurol, Biomagnet Ctr, D-07740 Jena, Germany
来源
EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1998年 / 108卷 / 06期
关键词
schizophrenia; magnetoencephalography; ocular artifact; regression;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00031-8
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Results: in a magnetoencephalographic investigation of the auditory evoked field (AEF) in 17 schizophrenics and 17 controls, 37% of the schizophrenics and 12% of the controls showed eye artifacts in every second trial or even more frequently. In the uncorrected average fields, the ratio between the power of artifacts and the power of the magnetoencephalogram (MEG) exceeded the value of 0.1 for 48% of the schizophrenics and for 29% of the controls. Ocular artifacts biased the locations of equivalent current dipoles of the M100 component towards deeper positions. A regression algorithm for the correction of ocular artifacts in raw data and an identification technique of ocular artifacts based on the topography of transmission coefficients is described. Conclusions: A linear dependence of ocular artifacts in AEF an the electrooculogram (EOG) was confirmed. Possible errors introduced by the correction are discussed. Transmission coefficients should be calculated for several individual trials with the same type of artifact. Errors due to evoked potentials in the EOG were found to be comparable in amplitude to noise in the AEF. Examples of transmission coefficients from the EOG to the MEG are given. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 535
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Adaptive AR modeling of nonstationary time series by means of Kalman filtering [J].
Arnold, M ;
Miltner, WHR ;
Witte, H ;
Bauer, R ;
Braun, C .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1998, 45 (05) :553-562
[2]   DIPOLE MODELING OF EYE ACTIVITY AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE REMOVAL OF EYE ARTIFACTS FROM THE EEG AND MEG [J].
BERG, P ;
SCHERG, M .
CLINICAL PHYSICS AND PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1991, 12 :49-54
[3]   A MULTIPLE SOURCE APPROACH TO THE CORRECTION OF EYE ARTIFACTS [J].
BERG, P ;
SCHERG, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 90 (03) :229-241
[4]   DIPOLE MODELS OF EYE-MOVEMENTS AND BLINKS [J].
BERG, P ;
SCHERG, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 79 (01) :36-44
[5]  
BERG P, 1997, ISBET 97 ZUR 8 WORLD
[6]  
CEGALIS JA, 1979, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V14, P13
[7]   DIFFERENTIAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF BLINKS AND VERTICAL EYE-MOVEMENTS AS ARTIFACTS IN EEG RECORDING [J].
CORBY, JC ;
KOPELL, BS .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1972, 9 (06) :640-&
[8]   REMOVAL OF OCULAR ARTIFACTS FROM THE EEG - A BIOPHYSICAL APPROACH TO THE EOG [J].
ELBERT, T ;
LUTZENBERGER, W ;
ROCKSTROH, B ;
BIRBAUMER, N .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 60 (05) :455-463
[9]   REMOVAL OF EYE-MOVEMENT AND ECG ARTIFACTS FROM THE NON-CEPHALIC REFERENCE EEG [J].
FORTGENS, C ;
DEBRUIN, MP .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 56 (01) :90-96
[10]   THE CORRECTION OF EOG ARTIFACTS BY FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT AND FREQUENCY INDEPENDENT METHODS [J].
GASSER, T ;
SROKA, L ;
MOCKS, J .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 23 (06) :704-712