A Multifaceted Intervention for Quality Improvement in a Network of Intensive Care Units A Cluster Randomized Trial

被引:132
作者
Scales, Damon C. [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ]
Dainty, Katie [8 ]
Hales, Brigette [4 ]
Pinto, Ruxandra [1 ]
Fowler, Robert A. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Adhikari, Neill K. J. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Zwarenstein, Merrick [3 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Crit Care Med, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Interdept Div Crit Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Qual & Patient Safety, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[5] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[6] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[7] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2011年 / 305卷 / 04期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
CLINICAL-TRIAL; PERFORMANCE; IMPLEMENTATION; MULTICENTER; MORTALITY; STATEMENT; MEDICINE; OUTCOMES; PROGRAM; PAY;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2010.2000
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Evidence-based practices improve intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes, but eligible patients may not receive them. Community hospitals treat most critically ill patients but may have few resources dedicated to quality improvement. Objective To determine the effectiveness of a multicenter quality improvement program to increase delivery of 6 evidence-based ICU practices. Design, Setting, and Participants Pragmatic cluster-randomized trial among 15 community hospital ICUs in Ontario, Canada. A total of 9269 admissions occurred during the trial (November 2005 to October 2006) and 7141 admissions during a decay-monitoring period (December 2006 to August 2007). Intervention We implemented a videoconference-based forum including audit and feedback, expert-led educational sessions, and dissemination of algorithms to sequentially improve delivery of 6 practices. We randomized ICUs into 2 groups. Each group received this intervention, targeting a new practice every 4 months, while acting as control for the other group, in which a different practice was targeted in the same period. Main Measure Outcomes The primary outcome was the summary ratio of odds ratios (ORs) for improvement in adoption (determined by daily data collection) of all 6 practices during the trial in intervention vs control ICUs. Results Overall, adoption of the targeted practices was greater in intervention ICUs than in controls (summary ratio of ORs, 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-7.74). Improved delivery in intervention ICUs was greatest for semirecumbent positioning to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (90.0% of patient-days in last month vs 50.0% in first month; OR, 6.35; 95% CI, 1.85-21.79) and precautions to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infection (70.0% of patients receiving central lines vs 10.6%; OR, 30.06; 95% CI, 11.00-82.17). Adoption of other practices, many with high baseline adherence, changed little. Conclusion In a collaborative network of community ICUs, a multifaceted quality improvement intervention improved adoption of care practices.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 372
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, HDB RES SYNTHESIS ME
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials
[3]  
[Anonymous], CRIT CARE MED
[4]  
[Anonymous], PHYS QUAL REP IN
[5]  
[Anonymous], INV CRIT CAR SERV AN
[6]   Outcomes and resource utilization for patients with prolonged critical illness managed by university-based or community-based subspecialists [J].
Bach, PB ;
Carson, SS ;
Leff, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (05) :1410-1415
[7]  
Berglund G, 1997, PSYCHO-ONCOL, V6, P35, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199703)6:1<35::AID-PON241>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-J
[9]  
BERGSTROM N, 1987, NURS CLIN N AM, V22, P417
[10]   A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews [J].
Boeije, H .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2002, 36 (04) :391-409