A new approach to dose escalation in non-small-cell lung cancer

被引:197
作者
Mehta, M
Scrimger, R
Mackie, R
Paliwal, B
Chappell, R
Fowler, J
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Human Oncol, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med Phys, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Bioengn, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biostat, Madison, WI 53792 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2001年 / 49卷 / 01期
关键词
lung cancer; dose escalation; fraction size; acceleration; helical tomotherapy; intensity modulation; phase I trial; Bayesian; dose-per-fraction; non-small-cell lung cancer;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01374-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe the radiobiological rationale for dose-per-fraction escalation in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSC-LC) and to devise a novel Phase I scheme to implement this strategy using advanced radiotherapy delivery technologies. Methods and Materials: The data from previous dose escalation trials in NSCLC are reanalyzed to establish a dose-response relationship in this disease. We also use data relating prolongation in treatment time to survival to compute the potential doubling time for lung tumors. On the basis of these results, and using a Bayesian model to determine the probability of pneumonitis as a function of mean normalized lung dose, a dose-per-fraction escalation strategy is developed. Results: Standard approaches to dose escalation using 2 Gy per fraction, five fractions per week, require doses in excess of 85 Gy to achieve 50% long-term control rate. This is partly because NSCLCs repopulate rapidly, with a 1.6% per day loss in survival from prolongation in overall treatment time beyond 6 weeks, and a cell doubling time of only 2.5 to 3.3 days. A dose-per-fraction escalation strategy, with a constant number of fractions, 25, and overall time, 5 weeks, is projected to produce tumor control rates predicted to be 10%-15% better than 2 Gy per fraction dose escalation, with equivalent late effects. This Phase I clinical study is divided into three parts. Step 1 examines the feasibility of the maximum breath-holding technique and junctioning of tomotherapy slices. Step 2 treats 10 patients with 30 fractions of 2 Gy over 6 weeks and then reduces duration to 5 weeks using fewer but larger fractions in 10 patients. Step 3 will consist of a dose-per-fraction escalation study on roughly 50 patients, maintaining 25 fractions in 5 weeks. Bayesian methodology (a modification of the Continual Reassessment Method) will be used in Step 3 to allow consistent and efficient escalation within five volume bins. Conclusions: A dose-per-fraction escalation approach in NSCLC should yield superior outcomes, compared to standard dose escalation approaches using a fixed dose per fraction, for a given level of pneumonitis and late toxicity. Highly conformal radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and helical tomotherapy with its adaptive capabilities, wilt be necessary to achieve significant dose-per-fraction escalation without unacceptable lung and esophageal morbidity. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 33
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Altered fractionation trials in head and neck cancer [J].
Ang, KK .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1998, 8 (04) :230-236
[2]  
ANG KK, 1997, RADIOTHER ONCOL, V44, P123
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, FRACTIONATION RADIOT
[4]  
BELDERBOS JSA, 9 WORLD C LUNG CANC
[5]   Repair halftimes estimated from observations of treatment-related morbidity after CHART or conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer [J].
Bentzen, SM ;
Saunders, MI ;
Dische, S .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1999, 53 (03) :219-226
[6]  
BONOMI P, 1995, LUNG CANC S2, V12, P41
[7]  
Brenner DJ, 1993, RADIAT ONCOL INVEST, V1, P167
[8]  
CHEVRET S, 1993, STAT MED, V12, P1093
[9]   EVALUATION OF ADJUVANT POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY FOR LUNG-CANCER [J].
CHUNG, CK ;
STRYKER, JA ;
ONEILL, M ;
DEMUTH, WE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1982, 8 (11) :1877-1880
[10]  
COX JD, 1992, CANCER, V69, P2744, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19920601)69:11<2744::AID-CNCR2820691119>3.0.CO