The influence of complex action knowledge on representations of novel graspable objects: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging

被引:38
作者
Creem-Regehr, Sarah H.
Dilda, Valentina
Vicchrilli, April E.
Federer, Frederick
Lee, James N.
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Psychol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Grad Program Neurosci, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Radiol, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
关键词
parietal lobe; frontal lobe; motor cortex; motor skills; grasp; perception;
D O I
10.1017/S1355617707071093
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The influence of action knowledge associated with novel objects was investigated using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were trained on complex actions associated with novel objects ("tools") and had experience manipulating other visually similar novel objects ("shapes"). During scanning, participants viewed, imagined grasping, and imagined using the objects. Based on previous neuroimaging and neuropsychological findings, our primary goal was to examine frontal and parietal regions subserving action representations associated with visual objects, namely the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL), the left ventral premotor cortex (VPM) and the presupplementary motor cortex (pre-SMA). We predicted differences between the tool and shape stimuli, modulated also by task demands. In viewing, we found greater effect sizes in the left VPM and IPL for tools versus shapes. In grasping, there was similar activation with both object types. The largest differences existed in using, in which greater effect sizes were found for tools versus shapes in left IPL and pre-SMA, and marginally in the left VPM. We suggest that representations of tools extend beyond classically defined affordances and recruit processing about both graspability and known action plans in tasks involving visual memory, motor imagery, and motor execution.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1020
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Allport D. A., 1985, CURRENT PERSPECTIVES, P32
[2]   Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements [J].
Beauchamp, MS ;
Lee, KE ;
Haxby, JV ;
Martin, A .
NEURON, 2002, 34 (01) :149-159
[3]   A parieto-premotor network for object manipulation: evidence from neuroimaging [J].
Binkofski, F ;
Buccino, G ;
Stephan, KM ;
Rizzolatti, G ;
Seitz, RJ ;
Freund, HJ .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 128 (1-2) :210-213
[4]   Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Boronat, CB ;
Buxbaum, LJ ;
Coslett, HB ;
Tang, K ;
Saffran, EM ;
Kimberg, DY ;
Detre, JA .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 23 (2-3) :361-373
[5]  
BRETT M, 2002, 9 INT C FUNCT MAPP H
[6]   Neural substrates of knowledge of hand postures for object grasping and functional object use: Evidence from fMRI [J].
Buxbaum, Laurel J. ;
Kyle, Kathleen M. ;
Tang, Kathy ;
Detre, John A. .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 1117 :175-185
[7]   Deficient internal models for planning hand-object interactions in apraxia [J].
Buxbaum, LJ ;
Johnson-Frey, SH ;
Bartlett-Williams, M .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2005, 43 (06) :917-929
[8]   Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia [J].
Buxbaum, LJ ;
Sirigu, A ;
Schwartz, MF ;
Klatzky, R .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2003, 41 (08) :1091-1113
[9]   Ideomotor apraxia: A call to action [J].
Buxbaum, LJ .
NEUROCASE, 2001, 7 (06) :445-458
[10]   Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects [J].
Buxbaum, LJ ;
Saffran, EM .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2002, 82 (02) :179-199