Efficacy of three ethanol-based hand rubs against feline calicivirus, a surrogate virus for norovirus

被引:75
作者
Kampf, G
Grotheer, D
Steinmann, J
机构
[1] Bode Chem GmbH & Co, Sci Affairs, D-22525 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Inst Hyg & Umweltmed, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany
[3] MikroLab GmbH, D-28259 Bremen, Germany
关键词
feline calicivirus; efficacy; fingerpad; hand rub; ethanol; norovirus;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhin.2004.12.005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
We investigated the efficacy of three ethanol-based hand rubs (Sterillium Virugard, 95% ethanol; Sterillium Rub, 80% ethanol; Desderman N, 75.1% ethanol) against feline calicivirus (FCV), the surrogate virus for norovirus, on artificially contaminated hands of healthy volunteers. The ASTM E 1838-02 standard was used. Experiments were controlled with 70% ethanol and 70% propan-1-ol. which were previously found to have maximal. efficacy against FCV. In the first step, three different organic loads (5% fetal bovine serum, 5% faecal. suspension and the tripartite ASTM load) were compared. A significant influence of the type of organic load was found (P < 0.001, ANOVA). In the second step, the hand rubs were investigated with a 5% faecal suspension as a challenging organic toad. The hand rub based on 95% ethanol was more effective than those based on 70% ethanol (mean log(10) reduction factor: 2.17 vs. 1.56; P=0.17) and 70% propan-1-ol (mean RF: 1.63 vs. 0.95; P=0.0003). The hand rub based on 80% ethanol was also more effective than those based on 70% ethanol (mean RF: 1.25 vs. 1.03: P=0.20) and 70% propan-1-ol (mean RF: 1.43 vs. 1.09; P=0.03). The hand rub based on 75.1% ethanol. was less effective than those based on 70% ethanol (mean RF: 1.07 vs. 1.27; P=0.47) and 70% propan-1-ol. (mean RF: 0.78 vs. 0.97; P=0.35). Based on our data, ethanol has superior efficacy against FCV than propan-1-ol. In addition, a higher ethanol concentration in three commercially available hand rubs was associated with better efficacy against FCV. (c) 2004 The Hospital. Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 149
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[31]  
Patterson W, 1997, Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev, V7, pR101
[32]  
Pittet D, 2001, LANCET, P9
[33]  
Rudolf M, 2003, HANDEHYGIENE GESUNDH, P71
[34]   Hygienic hand antiseptics: Should they not have activity and label claims against viruses? [J].
Sattar, SA ;
Springthorpe, VS ;
Tetro, J ;
Vashon, R ;
Keswick, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2002, 30 (06) :355-372
[35]   THE METHOD OF 'RIGHT AND WRONG CASES' ('CONSTANT STIMULI') WITHOUT GAUSS'S FORMULAE [J].
Spearman, C. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1908, 2 :227-242
[36]  
Ward J, 2000, Commun Dis Intell, V24, P229
[37]  
Wolff MH, 2001, J HOSP INFECT, V48, pS18
[38]  
1982, BUNDESGESUNDHBL, V25, P397
[39]  
2001, EPIDEMIOLOGISCHES B, P81
[40]  
2000, MMWR MORB MORTAL WKL, V49, P207