Do differences in sex hormones affect handwriting style? Evidence from digit ratio and sex role identity as determinants of the sex of handwriting

被引:36
作者
Beech, JR [1 ]
Mackintosh, IC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Sch Psychol, Leicester LE2 7RH, Leics, England
关键词
handwriting; digit ratio; sex role; gender; sex hormones;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.024
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study investigated whether there could be a biological determinant of the judged gender of handwriting. It further investigated the potential interplay between these variables and sex role identification. The biological marker used was 213:413 digit ratio (of index to ring finger length) which is negatively associated with prenatal testosterone and positively with prenatal oestrogen. Handwriting samples of 120 participants (half of each sex) were presented on computer to be rated for gender by 20 raters. Feedback on accuracy was given after each trial. These raters accurately identified the gender of two thirds of the sample and the rated difference between the sexes was large (d = 0.75). These ratings of handwriting gender correlated significantly with digit ratio and the femininity scale of the BSRI. A more conservative analysis this time within each sex found that women's right hand digit ratio correlated with relative sexuality of handwriting, but there was no corresponding relationship for the males. These findings suggest that prenatal hormonal influences can affect later female handwriting performance and might even affect developmental inter-hemispheric differences, but do not appear to impact on males. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 468
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
BERN SL, 1974, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V42, P155, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0036215
[2]   Judging gender from samples of adult handwriting: Accuracy and use of cues [J].
Burr, V .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 142 (06) :691-700
[3]   The structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A summary report of 23 validation studies [J].
Choi, N ;
Fuqua, DR .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 63 (05) :872-887
[4]   AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY OF THE VALIDITY OF HANDWRITING ANALYSIS [J].
EYSENCK, HJ ;
GUDJONSSON, G .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1986, 7 (02) :263-264
[5]   GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PERSONALITY - A METAANALYSIS [J].
FEINGOLD, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1994, 116 (03) :429-456
[6]   GRAPHOLOGY AND PERSONALITY - ANOTHER FAILURE TO VALIDATE GRAPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS [J].
FURNHAM, A ;
GUNTER, B .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1987, 8 (03) :433-435
[7]   SEX DIFFERENCES IN JUDGING THE SEX OF HANDWRITING [J].
Goodenough, Florence L. .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1945, 22 (01) :61-68
[8]  
Hartley J., 1991, British Educational Research Journal, V17, P141
[9]   Identifying sex from handwriting [J].
Hayes, WN .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1996, 83 (03) :791-800
[10]   Illusory correlations in graphological inference [J].
King, RN ;
Koehler, DJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2000, 6 (04) :336-348