A new framework for managing and analyzing multiply imputed data in Stata

被引:204
作者
Carlin, John B. [1 ,2 ]
Galati, John C. [1 ,2 ]
Royston, Patrick [3 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol & Biostat Unit, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[3] MRC, Clin Trial Unit, Cancer & Stat Methodol Grp, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
st0139; mim; mimstack; ice; micombine; miset; mifit; multiple imputation; missing data; missing at random;
D O I
10.1177/1536867X0800800104
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
A new set of tools is described for performing analyses of an ensemble of datasets that includes multiple copies of the original data with imputations of missing values, as required for the method of multiple imputation. The tools replace those originally developed by the authors. They are based on a simple data management paradigm in which the imputed datasets are all stored along with the original data in a single dataset with a vertically stacked format, as proposed by Royston in his ice and micombine commands. Stacking into a single dataset simplifies the management of the imputed datasets compared with storing them individually. Analysis and manipulation of the stacked datasets is performed with a new prefix command, mim, which can accommodate data imputed by any method as long as a few simple rules are followed in creating the imputed data. mim can validly fit most of the regression models available in Stata to multiply imputed datasets, giving parameter estimates and confidence intervals computed according to Rubin's results for multiple imputation inference. Particular attention is paid to limiting the available postestimation commands to those that are known to be valid within the multiple imputation context. However, the user has flexibility to override these defaults. Features of these new tools are illustrated using two previously published examples.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 67
页数:19
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple imputation [J].
Barnard, J ;
Rubin, DB .
BIOMETRIKA, 1999, 86 (04) :948-955
[2]   Tools for analyzing multiple imputed datasets [J].
Carlin, John B. ;
Li, Ning ;
Greenwood, Philip ;
Coffey, Carolyn .
STATA JOURNAL, 2003, 3 (03) :226-244
[3]   Sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation under missing at random: a weighting approach [J].
Carpenter, James R. ;
Kenward, Michael G. ;
White, Ian R. .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (03) :259-275
[4]   LARGE-SAMPLE SIGNIFICANCE LEVELS FROM MULTIPLY IMPUTED DATA USING MOMENT-BASED STATISTICS AND AN F-REFERENCE DISTRIBUTION [J].
LI, KH ;
RAGHUNATHAN, TE ;
RUBIN, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 86 (416) :1065-1073
[5]  
Little R. J., 2019, STAT ANAL MISSING DA, V793, DOI DOI 10.1002
[6]   Can one assess whether missing data are missing at random in medical studies? [J].
Potthoff, Richard F. ;
Tudor, Gail E. ;
Pieper, Karen S. ;
Hasselblad, Vic .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 15 (03) :213-234
[7]   Multiple imputation of missing values: further update of ice, with an emphasis on interval censoring [J].
Royston, Patrick .
STATA JOURNAL, 2007, 7 (04) :445-464
[8]   Multiple imputation of missing values: Update of ice [J].
Royston, Patrick .
STATA JOURNAL, 2005, 5 (04) :527-536
[9]   Multiple imputation of missing values [J].
Royston, Patrick .
STATA JOURNAL, 2004, 4 (03) :227-241
[10]   Multiple imputation after 18+ years [J].
Rubin, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 91 (434) :473-489