Classifying general medicine readmissions - Are they preventable?

被引:89
作者
Oddone, EZ
Weinberger, M
Homer, M
Mengel, C
Goldstein, F
Ginier, P
Smith, D
Huey, J
Farber, NJ
Asch, DA
Loo, L
Mack, E
Hurder, AG
Henderson, W
Feussner, JR
机构
[1] Ctr. Hlth. Serv. Res. in Prim. Care, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC
[2] Richard L. Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN
[3] Dwight D. Eisenhower VAMC, Leavenworth, KS
[4] William Jennings Bryan Dorn VAMC, Columbia, SC
[5] Jerry Pettis Memorial VAMC, Loma Linda, CA
[6] Ctr. for Coop. Studs. in Hlth. Serv., VAMC, Hines, IL
[7] Ctr. Hlth. Serv. Res. in Prim. Care, VAMC, Durham
关键词
hospital readmissions; quality of care; preventability of hospitalization;
D O I
10.1007/BF02599027
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: To describe a new quality assessment method used to classify the preventability of hospitalization in terms of patient, clinician, or system factors. DESIGN:The instrument was developed in two phases. Phase I was a prospective comparison of admitting residents' and their attending physicians' classifications of the perceived preventability of consecutive admissions to one Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) excluding admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU). In phase 2, a panel of 10 physicians rated 811 abstracted records of readmissions from nine VAMCs. SETTING: Nine VAMCs across the United States with varying degrees of university hospital affiliation. PATIENTS: Phase 1, 156 patients admitted to the general medicine service at the Durham VAMC. Phase 2, 514 patients accounting for 811 readmissions within 6 months of a general medicine service discharge at nine VAMCs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physicians used a checklist to record the reason for hospitalization, the preventability of the hospitalization, and, if preventable, a reason defining preventability, which was classified in terms of system, clinician, and patient factors. In phase 2, two physician panelists assessed preventability for each chart. When two panelists disagreed on the preventability of hospitalization, a third panelist, blind to the original assessments, rated the chart. In phase 1, residents and attending physicians rated 33% and 34% of admissions as preventable (kappa = 0.41), respectively. In phase 2, 277 (34%) of 811 readmissions were deemed preventable. Intraobserver accuracy for the assessment of preventability was 96% (kappa = 0.89). Interobserver accuracy was 73% (kappa = 0.43). Hospital system factors accounted for 37% of preventable readmissions, clinician factors for 38%, and patient factors for 21%. The nine hospitals differed markedly in their profile of reasons for preventable readmissions (p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Using a new method of determining the preventability of hospitalizations, we identified several factors that might avert hospitalizations. Focusing efforts to identify preventable hospitalizations may yield better methods for managing patients' total health care needs: however, the content of those efforts will vary by institution.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 607
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   11 WORTHY AIMS FOR CLINICAL LEADERSHIP OF HEALTH SYSTEM REFORM [J].
BERWICK, DM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (10) :797-802
[2]   ASSESSING THE PREVENTABILITY OF EMERGENCY HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS - A METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF MEDICAL-CARE IN A PRIMARY CARE FACILITY [J].
BIGBY, J ;
DUNN, J ;
GOLDMAN, L ;
ADAMS, JB ;
JEN, P ;
LANDEFELD, CS ;
KOMAROFF, AL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 83 (06) :1031-1036
[3]   PREVENTABLE HOSPITALIZATIONS AND ACCESS TO HEALTH-CARE [J].
BINDMAN, AB ;
GRUMBACH, K ;
OSMOND, D ;
KOMAROMY, M ;
VRANIZAN, K ;
LURIE, N ;
BILLINGS, J ;
STEWART, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (04) :305-311
[4]  
COCHRAN WG, 1977, SAMPLING TECHNIQUES, P64
[5]   PREVENTABLE DEATHS - WHO, HOW OFTEN, AND WHY [J].
DUBOIS, RW ;
BROOK, RH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1988, 109 (07) :582-589
[6]   HOSPITAL READMISSION RATES FOR COHORTS OF MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES IN BOSTON AND NEW-HAVEN [J].
FISHER, ES ;
WENNBERG, JE ;
STUKEL, TA ;
SHARP, SM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (15) :989-995
[7]  
Fleiss J. L., 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P, P598
[8]  
FRANKL SE, 1991, AM J MED, V90, P667
[9]   THE APPROPRIATENESS EVALUATION PROTOCOL - A TECHNIQUE FOR ASSESSING UNNECESSARY DAYS OF HOSPITAL-CARE [J].
GERTMAN, PM ;
RESTUCCIA, JD .
MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (08) :855-871
[10]   THE RELIABILITY OF PEER ASSESSMENTS OF QUALITY OF CARE [J].
GOLDMAN, RL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (07) :958-960