Estimating treatment effects from spatial policy experiments: An application to Ugandan microfinance

被引:25
作者
McIntosh, Craig [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Int Relat Pacific Studies, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1162/rest.90.1.15
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper demonstrates a method for estimating treatment effects in spatial tests, utilizing a second control group to measure unexplained spatial phenomena. The technique is implemented on two innovations in Ugandan microfinance, and we measure the ways in which concurrent shocks such as an Ebola outbreak and a contentious presidential election altered outcomes differentially across regions. By correcting. for this spatial heterogeneity, we measure the impact of the policies; a program that increased borrowers' control over the terms of their loans improved outcomes, while the results of a program that bundled health insurance into the lending contract were more mixed.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 28
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects [J].
Abadie, A ;
Imbens, GW .
ECONOMETRICA, 2006, 74 (01) :235-267
[2]  
ANGRIST I, 1995, 181 NBER
[3]   THE (MIS)ALLOCATION OF CAPITAL [J].
Banerjee, Abhijit V. ;
Duflo, Esther ;
Munshi, Kaivan .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2003, 1 (2-3) :484-494
[4]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[5]  
CARD D, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P772
[6]  
de Aghion BA, 2000, ECON TRANSIT, V8, P401
[7]   Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies [J].
Dehejia, RH ;
Wahba, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2002, 84 (01) :151-161
[8]   Group lending, local information and peer selection [J].
Ghatak, M .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1999, 60 (01) :27-50
[9]  
GRUBER J, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P622
[10]   The demand for hours of labor: Direct evidence from California [J].
Hamermesh, DS ;
Trejo, SJ .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2000, 82 (01) :38-47