Evolutionary dynamics of scientific collaboration networks: multi-levels and cross-time analysis

被引:94
作者
Abbasi, Alireza [1 ]
Hossain, Liaquat [1 ]
Uddin, Shahadat [1 ]
Rasmussen, Kim J. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Engn & IT, Ctr Complex Syst Res, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Engn & IT, Sch Civil Engn, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Evolutionary collaboration networks; Dynamic network analysis; Social network analysis; Co-authorship analysis; Multi-levels and cross-time analysis; SELF-ORGANIZATION; CENTRALITY; PATTERNS; INDEX;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-011-0463-1
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Several studies exist which use scientific literature for comparing scientific activities (e. g., productivity, and collaboration). In this study, using co-authorship data over the last 40 years, we present the evolutionary dynamics of multi level (i.e., individual, institutional and national) collaboration networks for exploring the emergence of collaborations in the research field of "steel structures". The collaboration network of scientists in the field has been analyzed using author affiliations extracted from Scopus between 1970 and 2009. We have studied collaboration distribution networks at the micro-, meso-and macro-levels for the 40 years. We compared and analyzed a number of properties of these networks (i.e., density, centrality measures, the giant component and clustering coefficient) for presenting a longitudinal analysis and statistical validation of the evolutionary dynamics of "steel structures" collaboration networks. At all levels, the scientific collaborations network structures were central considering the closeness centralization while betweenness and degree centralization were much lower. In general networks density, connectedness, centralization and clustering coefficient were highest in marco-level and decreasing as the network size grow to the lowest in micro-level. We also find that the average distance between countries about two and institutes five and for authors eight meaning that only about eight steps are necessary to get from one randomly chosen author to another.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 710
页数:24
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Abbasi A., 2011, P 44 ANN HAW INT C S, DOI [10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.007, DOI 10.1016/J.J0I.2011.05.007]
[2]  
Abbasi A., 2010, Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing
[3]  
Abbasi A., 2011, J INFORMETRICS
[4]   Evaluating scholars based on their academic collaboration activities: two indices, the RC-index and the CC-index, for quantifying collaboration activities of researchers and scientific communities [J].
Abbasi, Alireza ;
Altmann, Joern ;
Hwang, Junseok .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, 83 (01) :1-13
[5]   Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis [J].
Acedo, Francisco Jose ;
Barroso, Carmen ;
Casanueva, Cristobal ;
Galan, Jose Luis .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2006, 43 (05) :957-983
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Connections
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Congressus Numerantium
[8]   Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Jeong, H ;
Néda, Z ;
Ravasz, E ;
Schubert, A ;
Vicsek, T .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2002, 311 (3-4) :590-614
[9]  
Bavelas A., 1950, J ACOUST SOC AM, V22, P725, DOI DOI 10.1121/1.1906679
[10]  
Borgatti S. P., 2002, Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis (Version 6), DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1439-0310.2009.01613.X, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01613.x]