Simple risk stratification at admission to identify patients with reduced mortality from primary angioplasty

被引:109
作者
Thune, JJ
Hoefsten, DE
Lindholm, MG
Mortensen, LS
Andersen, HR
Nielsen, TT
Kober, L
Kelbaek, H
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Rigshosp, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Funen Hosp, Dept Med Res, Svendborg, Denmark
[3] UNIC, Danish Informat Technol Ctr Educ & Res, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Skejby Hosp, Dept Cardiol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
angioplasty; fibrinolysis; mortality; myocardial infarction;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.558676
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background - Randomized trials comparing fibrinolysis with primary angioplasty for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction have demonstrated a beneficial effect of primary angioplasty on the combined end point of death, reinfarction, and disabling stroke but not on all-cause death. Identifying a patient group with reduced mortality from an invasive strategy would be important for early triage. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score is a simple validated integer score that makes it possible to identify high-risk patients on admission to hospital. We hypothesized that a high-risk group might have a reduced mortality with an invasive strategy. Methods and Results - We classified 1527 patients from the Danish Multicenter Randomized Study on Fibrinolytic Therapy Versus Acute Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction ( DANAMI-2) trial with information for all variables necessary for calculating the TIMI risk score as low risk ( TIMI risk score, 0 to 4) or high risk ( TIMI risk score >= 5) and investigated the effect of primary angioplasty versus fibrinolysis on mortality and morbidity in the 2 groups. Follow- up was 3 years. We classified 1134 patients as low risk and 393 as high risk. There was a significant interaction between risk status and effect of primary angioplasty ( P = 0.008). In the low-risk group, there was no difference in mortality ( primary angioplasty, 8.0%; fibrinolysis, 5.6%; P = 0.11); in the high-risk group, there was a significant reduction in mortality with primary angioplasty ( 25.3% versus 36.2%; P = 0.02). Conclusions - Risk stratification at admission based on the TIMI risk score identifies a group of high-risk patients who have a significantly reduced mortality with an invasive strategy of primary angioplasty.
引用
收藏
页码:2017 / 2021
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Task force 1: The ACCF and AHA codes of conduct in human subjects research [J].
Adams, RJ ;
Antman, EM ;
Kavey, REW .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (16) :2512-2516
[2]   A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction [J].
Andersen, HR ;
Nielsen, TT ;
Rasmussen, K ;
Thuesen, L ;
Kelbaek, H ;
Thayssen, P ;
Abildgaard, U ;
Pedersen, F ;
Madsen, JK ;
Grande, P ;
Villadsen, AB ;
Krusell, LR ;
Haghfelt, T ;
Lomholt, P ;
Husted, SE ;
Vigholt, E ;
Kjaergard, HK ;
Mortensen, LS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (08) :733-742
[3]   Danish multicenter randomized study on fibrinolytic therapy versus acute coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: Rationale and design of the DANish trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction-2 (DANAMI-2) [J].
Andersen, HR ;
Nielsen, TT ;
Vesterlund, T ;
Grande, P ;
Abildgaard, U ;
Thayssen, P ;
Pedersen, F ;
Mortensen, LS .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 146 (02) :234-241
[4]   Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis are both reasonable options in acute myocardial infarction [J].
Brophy, JM ;
Bogaty, P .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (04) :292-297
[5]   Transfer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction - A meta-analysis [J].
Dalby, M ;
Bouzamondo, A ;
Lechat, P ;
Montalescot, G .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (15) :1809-1814
[6]   From guidelines to clinical practice: the impact of hospital and geographical characteristics on temporal trends in the management of acute coronary syndromes - The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) [J].
Fox, KAA ;
Goodman, SG ;
Anderson, FA ;
Granger, CB ;
Moscucci, M ;
Flather, MD ;
Spencer, F ;
Budaj, A ;
Dabbous, OH ;
Gore, JM .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (15) :1414-1424
[7]   A Randomized trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction - The Air Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction study [J].
Grines, CL ;
Westerhausen, DR ;
Grines, LL ;
Hanlon, JT ;
Logemann, TL ;
Niemela, M ;
Weaver, WD ;
Graham, M ;
Boura, J ;
O'Neill, WW ;
Balestrini, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (11) :1713-1719
[8]   Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock [J].
Hochman, JS ;
Sleeper, LA ;
Webb, JG ;
Sanborn, TA ;
White, HD ;
Talley, JD ;
Buller, CE ;
Jacobs, AK ;
Slater, JN ;
Col, J ;
McKinlay, SM ;
LeJemtel, TH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (09) :625-634
[9]   Sequential risk stratification using TIMI risk score and TIMI flow grade among patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction [J].
Karmpaliotis, D ;
Turakhia, MP ;
Kirtane, A ;
Murphy, SA ;
Kosmidou, I ;
Morrow, DA ;
Giugliano, RP ;
Cannon, CP ;
Antman, EM ;
Braunwald, E ;
Gibson, CM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 94 (09) :1113-1117
[10]   Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials [J].
Keeley, EC ;
Boura, JA ;
Grines, CL .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9351) :13-20