Comparison of dose calculation algorithms with Monte Carlo methods for photon arcs

被引:30
作者
Chow, JCL
Wong, E
Chen, JZ
Van Dyk, J
机构
[1] London Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Phys, London, ON N6A 4L6, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Oncol, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Appl Math, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Phys & Astron, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[5] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Med Biophys, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[6] Grand River Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Kitchener, ON N2G 1G3, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.1601331
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The objective of this study. is to seek an accurate and efficient method to calculate the dose distribution of a photon arc. The algorithms tested include Monte Carlo, pencil beam kernel (PK), and collapsed cone convolution (CCC). For the Monte Carlo dose calculation, EGS4/DOSXYZ was used. The SRCXYZ source code associated with the DOSXYZ was modified so that the gantry angle of a photon beam would be sampled uniformly within the arc range about an isocenter to simulate a photon arc. Specifically, photon beams (6/18 MV, 4 x 4 and 10 x 10 cm(2)) described by a phase space file generated by BEAM (MCPHS), or by two point sources. with different photon energy spectra (MCDIV) were used. These methods were used to calculate three-dimensional (3-D) distributions in a PMMA phantom, a cylindrical water phantom, and a phantom with lung inhomogeneity. A commercial treatment planning system was also used to calculate dose distributions in these phantoms using equivalent tissue air ratio (STAR), PK and CCC algorithms for inhomogeneity corrections. Dose distributions for a photon arc in these phantoms were measured using a RK ion chamber and radiographic films. For homogeneous phantoms, the measured results agreed well (similar to2% error) with predictions by the Monte Carlo simulations (MCPHS and MCDIV) and the treatment planning system for the 180degrees and 360degrees photon arcs. For the dose distribution in the phantom with lung inhomogeneity with a 90degrees photon arc, the Monte Carlo calculations agreed with the measurements within 2%, while the treatment planning system using ETAR, PK and CCC underestimated or overestimated the dose inside the lung inhomogeneity from 6% to 12%. (C) 2003 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2686 / 2694
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   COLLAPSED CONE CONVOLUTION OF RADIANT ENERGY FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION IN HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA [J].
AHNESJO, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (04) :577-592
[2]  
[Anonymous], LA12625 LOS AL NAT L
[3]   The impact of electron transport on the accuracy of computed dose [J].
Arnfield, MR ;
Siantar, CH ;
Siebers, J ;
Garmon, P ;
Cox, L ;
Mohan, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (06) :1266-1274
[4]  
BERGER MJ, 1982, NBSIR822451
[5]  
Brahme A., 1988, Acta Oncologica, V15, P1
[6]  
CAROL MP, 1994, 11 INT C US COMP RAD, P172
[7]   A two-source model for electron beams: Calculation of relative output factors [J].
Chen, JZ ;
VanDyk, J ;
Lewis, C ;
Battista, JJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (08) :1735-1745
[8]  
COX LJ, 1997, UCRLJC126731 LAWR LI
[9]   CT-based Monte Carlo simulation tool for dosimetry planning and analysis [J].
DeMarco, JJ ;
Solberg, TD ;
Smathers, JB .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (01) :1-11
[10]   ACCURACY OF LUNG DOSE CALCULATIONS FOR LARGE-FIELD IRRADIATION WITH 6-MV X-RAYS [J].
ELKHATIB, E ;
BATTISTA, JJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1986, 13 (01) :111-116