Bone graft for revision hip arthroplasty

被引:87
作者
Gamradt, SC [1 ]
Lieberman, JR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Hlth Sci Ctr, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.blo.0000096814.78689.77
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Revision total hip arthroplasty often presents surgeons with difficult bone loss problems. The selection of an appropriate bone graft is influenced by the size of the bone defect, the location, the biology of the bone graft site, and whether the graft is required for structural support. Autogenous bone graft remains the gold standard bone graft material but there only is a limited amount available and there is morbidity associated with the harvesting of these grafts. The most frequently used bone graft materials include autogenous iliac crest bone graft, cancellous allograft chips, dernineralized bone matrix, and bulk structural allografts (femoral head, distal or proximal femoral allograft, whole acetabuli, and femoral strut grafts). It often is difficult to determine on plain radiographs whether nonstructural grafts actually incorporate into the host bone. Recently, attention has focused on the use of new materials for bone grafting including: new demineratized bone matrices, ceramics, autologous platelet concentrates, recombinant proteins, and stem cells. The purpose of this review was to assess the biologic potential of these nonstructurall grafts in revision hip arthroplasty and their limitations. Are these agents actually incorporating into host bone? Future bone graft options, including tissue engineering and gene therapy will be discussed briefly.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 194
页数:12
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes [J].
Ahlmann, E ;
Patzakis, M ;
Roidis, N ;
Shepherd, L ;
Holtom, P .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (05) :716-720
[2]  
[Anonymous], APSAC ADVISOR
[3]   2- to 10-year follow-up study of acetabular revisions using allograft bone to repair bone defects [J].
Avci, S ;
Connors, N ;
Petty, W .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (01) :61-69
[4]  
Bauer TW, 2002, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V395, DOI [10.1097/00003086-200202000-00003, DOI 10.1097/00003086-200202000-00003]
[5]   Clinical applications of bone graft substitutes in spine surgery: consideration of mineralized and demineralized preparations and growth factor supplementation [J].
Berven, S ;
Tay, BKB ;
Kleinstueck, FS ;
Bradford, DS .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2001, 10 (Suppl 2) :S169-S177
[6]  
Blaha JD, 1998, ORTHOPEDICS, V21, P1017
[7]  
Boden SD, 1998, J SPINAL DISORD, V11, P95
[8]   1998 Volvo Award winner in basic science studies - Lumbar spine fusion by local gene therapy with a cDNA encoding a novel osteoinductive protein (LMP-1) [J].
Boden, SD ;
Titus, L ;
Hair, G ;
Liu, YS ;
Viggeswarapu, M ;
Nanes, MS ;
Baranowski, C .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (23) :2486-2492
[9]   IMMUNE-RESPONSES OF RATS TO FROZEN BONE ALLOGRAFTS [J].
BOS, GD ;
GOLDBERG, VM ;
ZIKA, JM ;
HEIPLE, KG ;
POWELL, AE .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1983, 65 (02) :239-246
[10]   The effect of implants loaded with autologous mesenchymal stem cells on the healing of canine segmental bone defects [J].
Bruder, SP ;
Kraus, KH ;
Goldberg, VM ;
Kadiyala, S .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1998, 80A (07) :985-996