An Analysis of River Bank Slope and Unsaturated Flow Effects on Bank Storage

被引:76
作者
Doble, Rebecca [1 ]
Brunner, Philip [2 ,3 ]
McCallum, James [2 ,4 ]
Cook, Peter G. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Land & Water, Natl Res Flagship, Water Healthy Country, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Chem Phys & Earth Sci, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[3] Univ Neuchatel, Ctr Hydrogeol & Geotherm, CH-2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland
[4] Natl Ctr Groundwater Res & Training, Adelaide, SA, Australia
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
STREAMFLOW; AQUIFERS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6584.2011.00821.x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Recognizing the underlying mechanisms of bank storage and return flow is important for understanding streamflow hydrographs. Analytical models have been widely used to estimate the impacts of bank storage, but are often based on assumptions of conditions that are rarely found in the field, such as vertical river banks and saturated flow. Numerical simulations of bank storage and return flow in river-aquifer cross sections with vertical and sloping banks were undertaken using a fully-coupled, surface-subsurface flow model. Sloping river banks were found to increase the bank infiltration rates by 98% and storage volume by 40% for a bank slope of 3.4 degrees from horizontal, and for a slope of 8.5 degrees, delay bank return flow by more than four times compared with vertical river banks and saturated flow. The results suggested that conventional analytical approximations cannot adequately be used to quantify bank storage when bank slope is less than 60 degrees from horizontal. Additionally, in the unconfined aquifers modeled, the analytical solutions did not accurately model bank storage and return flow even in rivers with vertical banks due to a violation of the dupuit assumption. Bank storage and return flow were also modeled for more realistic cross sections and river hydrograph from the Fitzroy River, Western Australia, to indicate the importance of accurately modeling sloping river banks at a field scale. Following a single wet season flood event of 12 m, results showed that it may take over 3.5 years for 50% of the bank storage volume to return to the river.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 86
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Muskingum river routing with dynamic bank storage [J].
Birkhead, AL ;
James, CS .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2002, 264 (1-4) :113-132
[2]   A numerical model for density-and-viscosity-dependent flows in two-dimensional variably saturated porous media [J].
Boufadel, MC ;
Suidan, MT ;
Venosa, AD .
JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 1999, 37 (1-2) :1-20
[3]   Modeling Surface Water-Groundwater Interaction with MODFLOW: Some Considerations [J].
Brunner, Philip ;
Simmons, Craig T. ;
Cook, Peter G. ;
Therrien, Rene .
GROUND WATER, 2010, 48 (02) :174-180
[4]   Hydrogeologic controls on disconnection between surface water and groundwater [J].
Brunner, Philip ;
Cook, Peter G. ;
Simmons, Craig T. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2009, 45
[5]   DEVELOPING JOINT PROBABILITY-DISTRIBUTIONS OF SOIL-WATER RETENTION CHARACTERISTICS [J].
CARSEL, RF ;
PARRISH, RS .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1988, 24 (05) :755-769
[6]   Stream water infiltration, bank storage, and storage zone changes due to stream-stage fluctuations [J].
Chen, X ;
Chen, XH .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2003, 280 (1-4) :246-264
[7]   Simulation of baseflow accounting for the effect of bank storage and its implication in baseflow separation [J].
Chen, Xi ;
Chen, David Yongqin ;
Chen, Xun-Hong .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 327 (3-4) :539-549
[8]  
COOPER HH, 1963, 1536J US DEP INT GEO
[9]   APPLICATION OF CONVOLUTION EQUATION TO STREAM-AQUIFER RELATIONSHIPS [J].
HALL, FR ;
MOENCH, AF .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1972, 8 (02) :487-&
[10]  
HARBAUGH AW, 2000, 0092 US GEOL SOC