Improving productivity and firm performance with enterprise resource planning

被引:97
作者
Beheshti, Hooshang M. [1 ]
Beheshti, Cyrus M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Radford Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Radford, VA 24142 USA
[2] Deloitte & Touche, Richmond, VA 23219 USA
关键词
productivity; performance; implementation; CRM; change; ERP; ERP II; strategy; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION; MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES; MEASURING ERP SUCCESS; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; PROJECT SUCCESS; CHINA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/17517575.2010.511276
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Productivity is generally considered to be the efficient utilisation of organisational resources and is measured in terms of the efficiency of a worker, company or nation. Focusing on efficiency alone, however, can be harmful to the organisation's long-term success and competitiveness. The full benefits of productivity improvement measures are realised when productivity is examined from two perspectives: operational efficiency (output/input) of an individual worker or a business unit as well as performance (effectiveness) with regard to end user or customer satisfaction. Over the years, corporations have adopted new technology to integrate business activities in order to achieve both effectiveness and efficiency in their operations. In recent years, many firms have invested in enterprise resource planning (ERP) in order to integrate all business activities into a uniform system. The implementation of ERP enables the firm to reduce the transaction costs of the business and improve its productivity, customer satisfaction and profitability.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 472
页数:28
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [1] AKAN O, 2006, J BUS STRAT, V27, P3
  • [2] An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment
    Amoako-Gyampah, K
    Salam, AF
    [J]. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2004, 41 (06) : 731 - 745
  • [3] Learn not to learn - a way of keeping budgets and deadlines in ERP projects?
    Andersson, Annika
    Linderoth, Henrik C. J.
    [J]. ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2008, 2 (01) : 77 - 95
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, 36 ANN HAW INT C SYS
  • [5] [Anonymous], 12 CARDINAL SINS ERP
  • [6] *AT T, 2009, AT T CORP PROF
  • [7] IT governance for enterprise resource planning supported by the DeLone-McLean model of information systems success
    Bernroider, Edward W. N.
    [J]. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 45 (05) : 257 - 269
  • [8] Biehl M, 2007, COMMUN ACM, V50, P53
  • [9] Bradford M., 2003, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, V4, P205, DOI 10.1016/S1467-0895(03)00026-5
  • [10] Bradley Joseph, 2008, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, V9, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.accinf.2008.04.001