Occupational exposure to static and time-varying gradient magnetic fields in MR units

被引:34
作者
Bradley, Jill K. [1 ]
Nyekiova, Matilda
Price, David L.
Lopez, Lindsay D'jon
Crawley, Therese
机构
[1] Churchill Hosp, Oxford Radcliffe Hosp Trust, Dept Med Phys & Clin Engn, Oxford OX3 7LJ, England
[2] Royal Berkshire Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Reading RG1 5AN, Berks, England
[3] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Bioengn, MagNET, London, England
[4] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Fac Med, London, England
关键词
MR staff exposure; MR safety; EU physical agents directive; gradient magnetic fields; static magnetic fields;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.21152
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess exposure of MR staff to static and time-varying gradient magnetic fields by direct measurement and questionnaire and to compare these to the action values and exposure limits stated in published guidance. Materials and Methods: Instantaneous and time-averaged exposure to static magnetic fields were measured on clinical and research MR scanners. A questionnaire was sent to 100 clinical MR centers to estimate the average static field exposure. Instantaneous measurements of the time-varying magnetic field were conducted on a 1.5T conventional and a 0.6T open-bore MR system. Results: The 24-hour time-averaged static field exposure was measured to be 1.8 +/- 1 mT and the questionnaire produced a 24-hour time-average of 2.3 mT. The maximum static field strength recorded during patient set up was 554 mT. Time-varying gradient field exposure was found to exceed the action values up to 30 cm from the bore entrance or magnet rim. Conclusion: The time-varying gradient field exposure limit is the only limit to be exceeded. The time-averaged static field exposure to staff was found to be 100 times lower than the recommended guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:1204 / 1209
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Ahlbom A, 1998, HEALTH PHYS, V74, P494
[2]   Impact of electromagnetic field exposure limits in Europe: Is the future of interventional MRI safe? [J].
Hill, DLG ;
Mcleish, K ;
Keevil, SF .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (09) :1135-1142
[3]  
*IEC, 1995, 60601233 IEC
[4]   Electromagnetic field exposure limitation and the future of MRI [J].
Keevil, SF ;
Gedroyc, W ;
Gowland, P ;
Hill, DLG ;
Leach, MO ;
Ludman, CN ;
McLeish, K ;
McRobbie, DW ;
Razavi, RS ;
Young, IR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 (935) :973-975
[5]  
MATTHES R, 1994, HEALTH PHYS, V66, P100
[6]  
Schenck JF, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V12, P2, DOI 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<2::AID-JMRI2>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-V
[8]  
*WHO, 2006, ENV HLTH CRIT WHO, V232
[9]  
XI W, 1994, APPL COMPUT ELECTROM, P9127
[10]  
2004, DOCUMENTS NRPB, V15, P1