Evaluation of genetic variation in the daylily (Hemerocallis spp.) using AFLP markers

被引:82
作者
Tomkins, JP
Wood, TC
Barnes, LS
Westman, A
Wing, RA
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Inst Genom, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[3] Methodist Coll, Dept Biol, Fayetteville, NC 28311 USA
关键词
Hemerocallis; daylily; genetic variation; AFLP;
D O I
10.1007/s001220051672
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The daylily (Hemerocallis spp.) is one of the most economically important ornamental plant species in commerce. Interestingly, it is also one of the most heavily bred crops during the past 60 years. Since the American Hemerocallis Society began acting as the official registry of daylily cultivars in 1947, more than 40 000 registrations have been processed. In order to determine the effects of intensive breeding on cultivar development, and to study relationships among different species, genetic variation in the daylily was estimated using AFLP markers. Nineteen primary genotypes (species and early cultivars) and 100 modern cultivars from different time periods were evaluated using 152 unambiguous bands (average 79% polymorphism rate) derived from three AFLP primer combinations. Overall, pairwise similarity estimates between entries ranged between 0.618 and 0.926 (average=0.800). When comparing cultivar groups from different time periods (1940-1998), genetic similarity was initially increased, compared to the primary diploid genotypes, remained constant from 1940 to 1980, and then steadily increased as breeding efforts intensified and hybridizers began focusing on a limited tetraploid germplasm pool derived by colchicine conversion. Among modern (1991-1998) daylily cultivars, genetic similarity has increased by approximately 10% compared to the primary genotypes. These data were also used to evaluate recent taxonomic classifications among daylily species which, with a few minor exceptions, were generally supported by the AFLP data.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 496
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Olive genetic diversity assessed using amplified fragment length polymorphisms [J].
Angiolillo, A ;
Mencuccini, M ;
Baldoni, L .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1999, 98 (3-4) :411-421
[2]  
[Anonymous], DOCUMENTATION PHYLIP
[3]  
Arumuganathan K., 1991, PLANT MOL BIOL REP, V9, P211, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02672069
[4]   AFLP fingerprinting in Pelargonium peltatum:: Its development and potential in cultivar identification [J].
Barcaccia, G ;
Albertini, E ;
Falcinelli, M .
JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1999, 74 (02) :243-250
[5]  
BAXTER G, 1999, HEMEROCALLIS CHECK L
[6]  
Brennan J. R., 1992, DAYLILY J, V47, P73, DOI [10.2135/cropsci1999.0 011183X003900040041x, DOI 10.2135/CROPSCI1999.0011183X003900040041X]
[7]   Application of AFLPs to the characterization of grapevine Vitis vinifera L. genetic resources.: A case study with accessions from Rioja (Spain) [J].
Cervera, MT ;
Cabezas, JA ;
Sancha, JC ;
de Toda, FM ;
Martínez-Zapater, JM .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1998, 97 (1-2) :51-59
[8]  
Erhardt W., 1992, HEMEROCALLIS DAYLILI
[9]   Clonal diversity in a Rhododendron ferrugineum L. (Ericaceae) population inferred from AFLP markers [J].
Escaravage, N ;
Questiau, S ;
Pornon, A ;
Doche, B ;
Taberlet, P .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 1998, 7 (08) :975-982
[10]  
HARLAN J R, 1971, Taxon, V20, P509, DOI 10.2307/1218252