Evaluation of the Hexaplex assay for detection of respiratory viruses in children

被引:106
作者
Kehl, SC
Henrickson, KJ
Hua, WM
Fan, J
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Pathol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Pediat, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[4] Prodesse Inc, Milwaukee, WI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.39.5.1696-1701.2001
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The Hexaplex assay (Prodesse, Inc., Milwaukee, Wis.) is a multiplex reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR assay for the detection of parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, and 3, respiratory syncytial virus (RST? types A and B, and influenza virus types A and B. We evaluated the Hexaplex assay in comparison,vith conventional viral cell cultures and rapid enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for RSV (Directigen; Becton Dickinson Inc., Cockeysville, Md.) and influenza A virus (Abbott Test Pack; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill.) for the detection of respiratory viruses from pediatric respiratory specimens obtained from children seen at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin from December 1997 through May 1998. A total of 363 respiratory specimens were evaluated. The tissue culture prevalence of parainflueuza virus during this period of time was low (1.1%). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of Hexaplex compared to tissue culture for the detection of parainfluenza virus were 100, 95.8, 19.0, and 100%, respectively. Only one specimen was determined to contain influenza B virus by Hexaplex; it was tissue culture negative. A specimen was considered to contain RSV or influenza A virus when it was either culture positive or culture negative but Hexaplex and EIA positive. Prior to the analysis of discrepant results, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of RSV were 91.2, 100, 100, and 98.0%, respectively, for tissue culture; 84.5, 100, 100, and 96.6% for EIA; and 98.5, 91.5, 72.8, and 99.6% for Hexaplex, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of influenza A virus prior to the analysis of discrepant results were 100, 100, 100, and 100%, respectively, for culture, 78.0, 100, 100, and 89.4% for EIA, respectively, and 95.1, 94.1, 67.2, and 99.3% for Hexaplex, respectively. Culture- and/or EIA-negative, Hexaplex-positive specimens were analyzed by a second RT-PCR assay which used primers specific for a different genomic region than that used in the Hexaplex assay. After analysis of these discrepant results, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of RSV were 74.3, 100, 100, and 93.5%, respectively, for tissue culture; 70.3, 100, 100, and 92.5% for EIA; and 98.6, 97.4, 91.2, and 99.6% for Hexaplex. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of influenza A virus were 83.3, 100, 100, and 97.4%, respectively, for tissue culture; 69.4, 100, 100, and 83.3% for EIA; and 95.8, 98.7, 92.0, and 99.3% for Hexaplex. Hexaplex is a rapid, sensitive, and specific method for the detection of the seven most common respiratory viruses in children.
引用
收藏
页码:1696 / 1701
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Effect of rapid viral diagnosis on the management of children hospitalized with lower respiratory tract infection
    Adcock, PM
    Stout, GG
    Hauck, MA
    Marshall, GS
    [J]. PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1997, 16 (09) : 842 - 846
  • [2] Comparison of reverse transcription PCR with tissue culture and other rapid diagnostic assays for detection of type A influenza virus
    Atmar, RL
    Baxter, BD
    Dominguez, EA
    Taber, LH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 34 (10) : 2604 - 2606
  • [3] Clinical and financial benefits of rapid detection of respiratory viruses: an outcomes study
    Barenfanger, J
    Drake, C
    Leon, N
    Mueller, T
    Troutt, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 38 (08) : 2824 - 2828
  • [4] A COMPARISON OF COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES FOR DIRECT AND INDIRECT IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE CULTURE CONFIRMATION AND DIRECT DETECTION OF PARAINFLUENZA VIRUSES
    BRINKER, JP
    DOERN, GV
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1992, 15 (08) : 669 - 672
  • [5] RAPID DIAGNOSIS OF INFLUENZA-A - COMPARISON WITH ELISA IMMUNOCAPTURE AND CULTURE
    CHOMEL, JJ
    REMILLEUX, MF
    MARCHAND, P
    AYMARD, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 1992, 37 (03) : 337 - 344
  • [6] PROSPECTIVE APPLICATION OF REVERSE-TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION FOR DIAGNOSING INFLUENZA INFECTIONS IN RESPIRATORY SAMPLES FROM A CHILDRENS-HOSPITAL
    CLAAS, ECJ
    VANMILAAN, AJ
    SPRENGER, MJW
    RUITENSTUIVER, M
    ARRON, GI
    ROTHBARTH, PH
    MASUREL, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 31 (08) : 2218 - 2221
  • [7] COMPARISON OF RAPID DIAGNOSTIC-TECHNIQUES FOR RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL AND INFLUENZA-A VIRUS RESPIRATORY-INFECTIONS IN YOUNG-CHILDREN
    DOMINGUEZ, EA
    TABER, LH
    COUCH, RB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 31 (09) : 2286 - 2290
  • [8] Respiratory syncytial virus is an important cause of community-acquired lower respiratory infection among hospitalized adults
    Dowell, SF
    Anderson, LJ
    Gary, HE
    Erdman, DD
    Plouffe, JF
    File, TM
    Marston, BJ
    Breiman, RF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1996, 174 (03) : 456 - 462
  • [9] Rapid diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus infections in immunocompromised adults
    Englund, JA
    Piedra, PA
    Jewell, A
    Patel, K
    Baxter, BB
    Whimbey, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 34 (07) : 1649 - 1653
  • [10] Rapid diagnosis of human parainfluenza virus type 1 infection by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR-enzyme hybridization assay
    Fan, J
    Henrickson, KJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 34 (08) : 1914 - 1917