Commodity chains, creative destruction and global inequality: a class analysis

被引:43
作者
Selwyn, Benjamin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Ctr Global Polit Econ, Brighton BN1 9SJ, E Sussex, England
关键词
Global commodity chains; creative destruction; global inequality; class analysis; PRODUCTION NETWORKS; WORLD; SCHUMPETER; GOVERNANCE; GLOBALIZATION; LABOR; HIERARCHY; REGIMES; WORKERS; STATES;
D O I
10.1093/jeg/lbu014
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The majority of global commodity chain analysis is concerned with producer firm upgrading, because it is held to engender local-level development. This represents a myopic comprehension of the interaction of firms under capitalism. This article argues, in contrast, that lead firm chain governance and supplier firm upgrading attempts constitute strategies and practices that reproduce global poverty and inequality. Schumpeter's concept of creative destruction represents a starting point in undertaking this endeavour. However, his formulation of capitalist competition ignores class and global economic relations. A Marxian conception of creative destruction, in contrast, rests upon an understanding of globally constituted class relations, which provides a novel perspective in comprehending and investigating processes that re-produce global poverty and inequality. The article substantiates these claims by examining cases of buyer-driven global commodity chains, and lead firm strategies of increasing labour exploitation throughout these chains.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 274
页数:22
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COMMUNICATION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Private Power, Public Law
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Clean Up Your Computer: Working conditions in the electronics sector
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, The Tacit Dimension
[5]  
[Anonymous], COMPETITION CHANGE
[6]  
[Anonymous], WORLD REGIONAL TREND
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Global Economic Prospects.
[8]  
[Anonymous], PUTTING DEV 1 IMPORT
[9]  
[Anonymous], HOW POOR IS POOR
[10]   Food regimes and the production of value: Some methodological issues [J].
Araghi, F .
JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2003, 30 (02) :41-70