Activity-monitor accuracy in measuring step number and cadence in community-dwelling older adults

被引:221
作者
Grant, P. Margaret [1 ]
Dall, Philippa M. [1 ]
Mitchell, Sarah L. [2 ]
Granat, Malcolm H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Glasgow G4 0BA, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Scottish Govt Hlth Dept, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
activPAL; accelerometer; pedometer; validity study;
D O I
10.1123/japa.16.2.201
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the activPAL physical activity monitor in measuring step number and cadence in older adults. Two pedometers (New-Lifestyles Digi-Walker SW-200 and New-Lifestyles NL-2000) used in clinical practice to count steps were simultaneously evaluated. Observation was the criterion measure. Twenty-one participants (65-87 yr old) recruited from community-based exercise classes walked on a treadmill at 5 speeds (0.67,0.90, 1.12, 1.33, and 1.56 m/s) and outdoors at 3 self-selected speeds (slow, normal, and fast). The absolute percentage error of the activPAL was < 1% for all treadmill and outdoor conditions for measuring steps and cadence. With the exception of the slowest treadmill speed, the NL-2000 error was < 2%. The SW-200 was the least accurate device, particularly at slower walking speeds. The activPAL monitor accurately recorded step number and cadence. Combined with its ability to identify primary postures, the activPAL might be a useful and versatile device for measuring activity in older adults.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 214
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   COMPENDIUM OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES - CLASSIFICATION OF ENERGY COSTS OF HUMAN PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES [J].
AINSWORTH, BE ;
HASKELL, WL ;
LEON, AS ;
JACOBS, DR ;
MONTOYE, HJ ;
SALLIS, JF ;
PAFFENBARGER, RS .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1993, 25 (01) :71-80
[2]   A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking [J].
Alton, F ;
Baldey, L ;
Caplan, S ;
Morrissey, MC .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1998, 13 (06) :434-440
[3]  
American College Sports Medicine, 2006, ACSMS GUID EX TEST P
[4]   Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked [J].
Bassett, DR ;
Ainsworth, BE ;
Leggett, SR ;
Mathien, CA ;
Main, JA ;
Hunter, DC ;
Duncan, GE .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1996, 28 (08) :1071-1077
[5]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[6]   Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running [J].
Brage, S ;
Wedderkopp, N ;
Franks, PW ;
Andersen, LB ;
Froberg, K .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2003, 35 (08) :1447-1454
[7]   Using step activity monitoring to characterize ambulatory activity in community-dwelling older adults [J].
Cavanaugh, James T. ;
Coleman, Kim L. ;
Gaines, Jean M. ;
Laing, Linda ;
Morey, Miriam C. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2007, 55 (01) :120-124
[8]  
CLARKEMOLONEY M, 2007, EUROPEAN J VASCULAR, V3, P488
[9]   Spring-levered versus piezo-electric pedometer accuracy in overweight and obese adults [J].
Crouter, SE ;
Schneider, PL ;
Bassett, DR .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2005, 37 (10) :1673-1679
[10]   Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost [J].
Crouter, SE ;
Schneider, PL ;
Karabulut, M ;
Bassett, DR .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2003, 35 (08) :1455-1460