Comparison of rizatriptan and other triptans on stringent measures of efficacy

被引:32
作者
Adelman, JU
Lipton, RB
Ferrari, MD
Diener, HC
McCarroll, KA
Vandormael, K
Lines, CR
机构
[1] Headache Wellness Ctr, Greensboro, NC 27401 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Univ Essen Gesamthsch, Dept Neurol, D-4300 Essen, Germany
[5] Merck Res Labs, West Point, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1212/WNL.57.8.1377
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy of oral rizatriptan 10 mg with oral doses of sumatriptan, naratriptan, and zolmitriptan on stringent outcome measures. Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from five randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked clinical trials in which oral rizatriptan was directly compared with oral sumatriptan 100 mg (n = 772), 50 mg (n = 1116), 25 mg (n = 1183), naratriptan 2.5 mg (n = 413), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (n = 580) for the acute treatment of a moderate or severe migraine attack. Outcome measures: Percentage of patients pain-free at 2 hours, symptom-free at 2 hours (no pain, nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, vomiting, or functional disability), 24-hour sustained pain-free (no headache at 2 hours, no recurrence, and no additional antimigraine medications for 24 hours). Results: More patients taking rizatriptan 10 mg were pain-free at 2 hours than were patients taking sumatriptan 100 mg (40% vs 33%, p = 0.019), sumatriptan 50 mg (40% vs 35%, p = 0.009), sumatriptan 25 mg (38% vs 27%, p < 0.001), naratriptan 2.5 mg (45% vs 21%, p < 0.001), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (43% vs 36%, p = 0.041). More patients taking rizatriptan 10 mg were symptom-free at 2 hours than were patients taking sumatriptan 100 mg (31% vs 22%, p = 0.002), sumatriptan 50 mg (33% vs 28%, p = 0.003), sumatriptan 25 mg (33% vs 24%, p < 0.001), naratriptan 2.5 mg (30% vs 11%, p < 0.001), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (31% vs 24%, p = 0.042). More patients taking rizatriptan 10 mg had a 24-hour sustained pain-free response than did patients taking sumatriptan 100 mg (27% vs 23%, p = 0.112), sumatriptan 50 mg (30% vs 26%, p = 0.015), sumatriptan 25 mg (27% vs 20%, p = 0.005), naratriptan 2.5 mg (29% Vs 17%, p = 0.004), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (32% vs 24%, p = 0.013). Conclusion: Oral rizatriptan 10 mg was more effective than oral sumatriptan, naratriptan, and zolmitriptan on stringent outcome measures of pain-free response at 2 hours; symptom-free response at 2 hours, and 24-hour sustained pain-free response.
引用
收藏
页码:1377 / 1383
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
ADELMAN JU, 2000, HEADACHE, V40, P401
[2]   Comparison of rizatriptan 10 mg vs. naratriptan 2.5 mg in migraine [J].
Bomhof, M ;
Paz, J ;
Legg, N ;
Allen, C ;
Vandormael, K ;
Patel, K .
EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 1999, 42 (03) :173-179
[3]   Effect of early intervention with sumatriptan on migraine pain: Retrospective analyses of data from three clinical trials [J].
Cady, RK ;
Sheftell, F ;
Lipton, RB ;
O'Quinn, S ;
Jones, M ;
Putnam, DG ;
Crisp, A ;
Metz, A ;
McNeal, S .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2000, 22 (09) :1035-1048
[4]   Determinants of patient satisfaction with migraine therapy [J].
Davies, GM ;
Santanello, N ;
Lipton, R .
CEPHALALGIA, 2000, 20 (06) :554-560
[5]   Migraine [J].
Ferrari, MD .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9108) :1043-1051
[6]  
GERTH WC, 2000, HEADACHE, V40, P408
[7]   A triptan too far? [J].
Goadsby, PJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 64 (02) :143-147
[8]   Crossover comparison of rizatriptan 5 mg and 10 mg versus sumatriptan 25 mg and 50 mg in migraine [J].
Goldstein, J ;
Ryan, R ;
Jiang, KH ;
Getson, A ;
Norman, B ;
Block, GA ;
Lines, C .
HEADACHE, 1998, 38 (10) :737-747
[9]  
Jones B, 1989, MONOGRAPHS STAT APPL
[10]   Comparison of rizatriptan 10 mg vs. zolmitriptan 2.5 mg in the acute treatment of migraine [J].
Pascual, J ;
Vega, P ;
Diener, HC ;
Allen, C ;
Vrijens, F ;
Patel, K .
CEPHALALGIA, 2000, 20 (05) :455-461