Emergency preoperative stenting versus surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

被引:238
作者
Pirlet, Isabelle A. [1 ]
Slim, Karem [2 ]
Kwiatkowski, Fabrice [3 ]
Michot, Francis [4 ]
Millat, Bertrand L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Montpellier Univ Hosp, Hop St Eloi, Digest Surg Unit, Montpellier 5, France
[2] Clermont Ferrand Univ Hosp, CHU Estaing, Digest Surg Unit, Clermont Ferrand, France
[3] Ctr Jean Perrin, Dept Stat, Clermont Ferrand, France
[4] Rouen Univ Hosp, Hop Charles Nicolle, Digest Surg Unit, Rouen, France
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2011年 / 25卷 / 06期
关键词
Acute obstruction; Colonic cancer; Self-expandable metallic stent; Stoma placement; EXPANDING METALLIC STENTS; LARGE-BOWEL OBSTRUCTION; COLORECTAL OBSTRUCTION; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; EFFICACY; CANCER; SAFETY; RATES;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-010-1471-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
Background Surgical management of left colonic cancer presenting as an acute obstruction remains controversial and still is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Recently, self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) have been used as a bridge to surgery in an attempt to decompress the colon and then allow elective one-stage surgical resection without stoma placement. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of emergency surgery alone with emergency placement of colonic SEMS as a bridge to surgery in terms of efficiency and reduction of the stoma placement rate. Methods A multicenter prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted according to the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) Statement criteria. Patients eligible for the study were randomized to either emergency surgery or emergency SEMS as a bridge to surgery. The primary outcome was the need for a stoma (temporary or permanent) for any reason. The secondary end points were mortality, morbidity, and length of hospital stay. Results Nine centers participated in the trial. Among the 70 patients eligible for the study, 60 were randomized and included for the final analysis, 30 patients in each group. Seven patients were randomized but did not fulfill the entry requirements, whereas three further eligible patients were not randomized for various reasons. Concerning the primary outcome, 17 patients in the surgery group sustained a stoma placement versus 13 patients in the SEMS group (p = 0.30). No statistically significant difference was noted concerning the secondary outcomes. A total of 16 attempts at SEMS placement (53.3%) were technical failures. Two colonic perforations directly related to the stent placement procedure occurred among the 30 randomized patients and 1 perforation occurred among the nonrandomized patients, leading to premature closure of inclusions in the study before the expected number of 80 patients was reached. Conclusion This randomized trial failed to demonstrate that emergency preoperative SEMS for patients presenting with acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction could significantly decrease the need for stoma placement.
引用
收藏
页码:1814 / 1821
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery - Results of a prospective multicenter study [J].
Alves, A ;
Panis, Y ;
Mathieu, P ;
Mantion, G ;
Kwiatkowski, F ;
Slim, K .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2005, 140 (03) :278-283
[2]
[Anonymous], 2004, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD002101.PUB2
[3]
Report of the clinical protocol committee: Development of randomized trials for malignant bowel obstruction [J].
Anthony, Thomas ;
Baron, Todd ;
Mercadante, Sebastiano ;
Green, Sylvan ;
Chi, Dennis ;
Cunningham, John ;
Herbst, Anne ;
Smart, Elizabeth ;
Krouse, Robert S. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2007, 34 (01) :S49-S59
[4]
Expandable metal stents for the treatment of colonic obstruction: techniques and outcomes [J].
Baron, TH ;
Dean, PA ;
Yates, MR ;
Canon, C ;
Koehler, RE .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 47 (03) :277-286
[5]
Systematic evaluation of surgical strategies for acute malignant left-sided colonic obstruction [J].
Breitenstein, S. ;
Rickenbacher, A. ;
Berdajs, D. ;
Puhan, M. ;
Clavien, P. -A. ;
Dernartines, N. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (12) :1451-1460
[6]
Malignant colorectal obstruction treated by means of self-expanding metallic stents:: Effectiveness before surgery and in palliation [J].
Camúñez, F ;
Echenagusia, A ;
Simó, G ;
Turégano, F ;
Vázquez, J ;
Barreiro-Meiro, I .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (02) :492-497
[7]
Endolaparoscopic Approach vs Conventional Open Surgery in the Treatment of Obstructing Left-Sided Colon Cancer A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Cheung, Hester Yui Shan ;
Chung, Chi Chiu ;
Tsang, Wilson Wen Chieng ;
Wong, James Cheuk Hoo ;
Yau, Kevin Kwok Kay ;
Li, Michael Ka Wah .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2009, 144 (12) :1127-1132
[8]
MALIGNANT OBSTRUCTION OF THE LEFT COLON [J].
DEANS, GT ;
KRUKOWSKI, ZH ;
IRWIN, ST .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (09) :1270-1276
[9]
Dohmoto M., 1991, ENDOSCOPICA DIGESTIV, V3, P1507
[10]
Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of colorectal stents [J].
Khot, UP ;
Lang, AW ;
Murali, K ;
Parker, MC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (09) :1096-1102