Progression and remission of pelvic organ prolapse: A longitudinal study of menopausal women

被引:241
作者
Handa, VL
Garrett, E
Hendrix, S
Gold, E
Robbins, J
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Med, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
uterine prolapse; cystocele; rectocele; women's health;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2003.07.017
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the natural history of pelvic organ prolapse after menopause. Study design: Over 2 to 8 years, participants in the estrogen plus progestin trial of the Women's Health Initiative at the University of California Davis had annual pelvic examinations, with an assessment of uterine prolapse, cystocele, and rectocele. The findings from these examinations were used to describe the incidence of pelvic organ prolapse, the probability of progression or regression, and the associated risk factors. Results: At baseline, 31.8% of women had pelvic organ prolapse (n=412 women). The annual incidences of cystocele, rectocele, and uterine prolapse were 9.3, 5.7, and 1.5 cases per 100 women-years, respectively. Incident prolapse was associated with increasing parity and waist circumference. The progression rates for grade 1 pelvic organ prolapse (per 100 women-years) were 9.5 for cystocele, 13.5 for rectocele, and 1.9 for uterine prolapse. The annual rates of regression (per 100 women-years) was 23.5, 22, and 48, respectively. Conclusion: Our data suggest that pelvic organ prolapse is not always chronic and progressive as traditionally thought. Spontaneous regression is common, especially for grade 1 prolapse. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 32
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Bland DR, 1999, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V181, P1324, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70371-6
[2]   The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction [J].
Bump, RC ;
Mattiasson, A ;
Bo, K ;
Brubaker, LP ;
DeLancey, JOL ;
Klarskov, P ;
Shull, BL ;
Smith, ARB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) :10-17
[3]   Anal sphincter injury during vaginal delivery - An argument for cesarean section on request? [J].
Faridi, A ;
Willis, S ;
Schelzig, P ;
Siggelkow, W ;
Schumpelick, V ;
Rath, W .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (05) :379-387
[4]   Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system [J].
Hall, AF ;
Theofrastous, JP ;
Cundiff, GW ;
Harris, RL ;
Hamilton, LF ;
Swift, SE ;
Bump, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (06) :1467-1470
[5]   Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: Gravity and gravidity [J].
Hendrix, SL ;
Clark, A ;
Nygaard, I ;
Aragaki, A ;
Barnabei, V ;
McTiernan, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (06) :1160-1166
[6]  
Kobak W H, 1996, Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, V7, P121, DOI 10.1007/BF01894199
[7]   Informed consent and birth: Protecting the pelvic floor and ourselves [J].
O'Boyle, AL ;
Davis, GD ;
Calhoun, BC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (04) :981-983
[8]   Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence [J].
Olsen, AL ;
Smith, VJ ;
Bergstrom, JO ;
Colling, JC ;
Clark, AL .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (04) :501-506
[9]  
Paterson-Brown S, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P462
[10]   Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors [J].
Samuelsson, EC ;
Victor, FTA ;
Tibblin, G ;
Svärdsudd, KF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (02) :299-305