Deep drainage and land use systems. Model verification and systems comparison

被引:23
作者
Paydar, Z
Huth, N
Ringrose-Voase, A
Young, R
Bernardi, T
Keating, B
Cresswell, H
机构
[1] CSIRO Land & Water, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] CSIRO Sustainable Ecosyst, APSRU, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia
[3] NSW Dept Primary Ind, Tamworth Agr Inst, Tamworth, NSW 2340, Australia
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH | 2005年 / 56卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1071/AR04303
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Deep drainage or drainage below the bottom of the pro. le usually occurs when rain infiltrates moist soil with insufficient capacity to store the additional water. This drainage is believed to be contributing to watertable rise and salinity in some parts of the Liverpool Plains catchment in northern New South Wales. The effect of land use on deep drainage was investigated by comparing the traditional long fallow system with more intense 'opportunity cropping'. Long fallowing (2 crops in 3 years) is used to store rainfall in the soil pro. le but risks substantial deep drainage. Opportunity cropping seeks to lessen this risk by sowing whenever there is sufficient soil moisture. Elements of the water balance and productivity were measured under various farming systems in a field experiment for 4 years in the southern part of the catchment. The experimental results were used to verify APSIM (Agricultural Production Systems Simulator) by comparing them with predictions of production, water storage, and runoff. The veri. cation procedure also involved local farmers and agronomists who assessed the credibility of the predictions and suggested modi. cations. APSIM provided a realistic simulation of common farming systems in the region and could capture the main hydrological and biological processes. APSIM was then used for long-term (41 years) simulations to predict deep drainage under different systems and extrapolate experimental results. The results showed large differences between agricultural systems mostly because differences in evapotranspiration contributed to differences in pro. le moisture when it rained. The model predicted that traditional long fallow farming systems (2 crops in 3 years) are quite 'leaky', with average annual deep drainage of 34 mm. However, by planting crops in response to the depth of moist soil ( opportunity or response cropping), APSIM predicted a much smaller annual drainage rate of 6 mm. Opportunity cropping resulted in overall greater water use and increased production compared with long fallowing. Furthermore, modelling indicated that average annual deep drainage under continuous sorghum (3 mm) is much less than under either long fallow cropping or continuous wheat (39 mm), demonstrating the importance of including summer cropping, as well as increasing cropping frequency, to reducing deep drainage.
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1007
页数:13
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Recharge estimation for the Liverpool Plains [J].
Abbs, K ;
Littleboy, M .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1998, 36 (02) :335-357
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1972, NAT ENG HDB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, AUSTR SOIL LAND SURV
[4]  
BRADD JM, 1994, DETERMINATION RECHAR
[5]  
BROUGHTON A, 1994, MOOKI RIVER CATCHMEN, V1
[6]  
GREINER R, 1994, EC ASSESSMENT DRYLAN
[7]  
HAYMAN PT, 1992, P GRASSL SOC NSW 7 A
[8]   Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data [J].
Jeffrey, SJ ;
Carter, JO ;
Moodie, KB ;
Beswick, AR .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2001, 16 (04) :309-330
[9]  
Jones C. A., 1986, CERES MAIZE SIMULATI
[10]   An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation [J].
Keating, BA ;
Carberry, PS ;
Hammer, GL ;
Probert, ME ;
Robertson, MJ ;
Holzworth, D ;
Huth, NI ;
Hargreaves, JNG ;
Meinke, H ;
Hochman, Z ;
McLean, G ;
Verburg, K ;
Snow, V ;
Dimes, JP ;
Silburn, M ;
Wang, E ;
Brown, S ;
Bristow, KL ;
Asseng, S ;
Chapman, S ;
McCown, RL ;
Freebairn, DM ;
Smith, CJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2003, 18 (3-4) :267-288