CT-scan, MRI and image-guided FNA cytology of incidental adrenal masses

被引:32
作者
Lumachi, F
Borsato, S
Tregnaghi, A
Basso, SMM
Marchesi, P
Ciarleglio, F
Fassina, A
Favia, G
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Sch Med, Dept Surg & Gastroenterol Sci, Endocrine Surg Unit, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Sch Med, Cytopathol Sect, Dept Pathol, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Sch Med, Radiol Sect, Dept Diagnost Med Sci, I-35128 Padua, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | 2003年 / 29卷 / 08期
关键词
adrenal neoplasm; adrenalectomy; FNAB; CT-scan; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/S0748-7983(03)00159-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness of computed tomography (CT)-scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in patients with incidentally discovered adrenal masses. Patients and methods: Thirty-four consecutive patients (six men and 28 women, median age of 47 years, range 2680) with non-functioning adrenal masses of 2 cm or more (median 3.5 cm, range 2-9) were studied. All patients underwent CT scan, MRI, and image-guided FNA cytology using spinal-type narrow-gauge needles prior to further procedures. Nineteen patients underwent adrenalectomy. Results: Final pathology showed 13 benign adrenal lesions, four adrenocortical carcinomas, and two unsuspected adrenal metastases. Fifteen patients who did not have surgery were considered definitively as having benign adrenal lesions since the mass was unchanged on CT scans performed during follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were 66.7, 85.7, and 50.0%, for CT-scan, 83.3, 92.9, and 71.4% for MRI, and 83.3, 100, and 100% (p < 0.05) for FNA cytology, respectively. Conclusions: Image-guided FNA cytology is a safe and sensitive procedure that may reveal unsuspected adrenal malignancies, and should be performed in all patients with incidentally discovered adrenal masses of more than 2 cm in size. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 692
页数:4
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Aron D. C., 2001, BASIC CLIN ENDOCRINO, P334
[2]   Can adrenal incidentalomas be safely observed? [J].
Barry, MK ;
van Heerden, JA ;
Farley, DR ;
Grant, CS ;
Thompson, GB ;
Ilstrup, DM .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 22 (06) :599-604
[3]  
Bastounis EA, 1997, AM SURGEON, V63, P356
[4]   Adrenal masses: Characterization with delayed contrast-enhanced CT [J].
Boland, GW ;
Hahn, PF ;
Pena, C ;
Mueller, PR .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 202 (03) :693-696
[5]   Characterization of adrenal masses using unenhanced CT: An analysis of the CT literature [J].
Boland, GWL ;
Lee, MJ ;
Gazelle, GS ;
Halpern, EF ;
McNicholas, MMJ ;
Mueller, PR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (01) :201-204
[6]  
CANDEL AG, 1993, SURGERY, V114, P1132
[7]   Adrenal masses: Characterization with combined unenhanced and delayed enhanced CT [J].
Caoili, EM ;
Korobkin, M ;
Francis, IR ;
Cohan, RH ;
Platt, JF ;
Dunnick, NR ;
Raghupathi, KI .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 222 (03) :629-633
[8]   What adrenal incidentalomas are to be operated? [J].
Chapuis, Y ;
Dousset, B ;
Bonnichon, P ;
Massault, PP ;
Hoeffel, C ;
Louvel, A .
ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 2001, 126 (10) :985-991
[9]  
de Agustín P, 1999, DIAGN CYTOPATHOL, V21, P92, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199908)21:2<92::AID-DC3>3.3.CO
[10]  
2-V