Safety Measures During Cholecystectomy: Results of a Nationwide Survey

被引:35
作者
Buddingh, K. T. [1 ]
Hofker, H. S. [1 ]
Hoedemaker, H. O. ten Cate [1 ]
van Dam, G. M. [1 ]
Ploeg, R. J. [1 ]
Nieuwenhuijs, V. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Surg, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
BILE-DUCT INJURY; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; INTRAOPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; BILIARY INJURY; SURGEON; COMPLICATIONS; REGISTRY;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-011-1061-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
This study aimed to identify safety measures practiced by Dutch surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An electronic questionnaire was sent to all members of the Dutch Society of Surgery with a registered e-mail address. The response rate was 40.4% and 453 responses were analyzed. The distribution of the respondents with regard to type of hospital was similar to that in the general population of Dutch surgeons. The critical view of safety (CVS) technique is used by 97.6% of the surgeons. It is documented by 92.6%, mostly in the operation report (80.0%), but often augmented by photography (42.7%) or video (30.2%). If the CVS is not obtained, 50.9% of surgeons convert to the open approach, 39.1% continue laparoscopically, and 10.0% perform additional imaging studies. Of Dutch surgeons, 53.2% never perform intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), 41.3% perform it incidentally, and only 2.6% perform it routinely. A total of 105 bile duct injuries (BDIs) were reported in 14,387 cholecystectomies (0.73%). The self-reported major BDI rate (involving the common bile duct) was 0.13%, but these figures need to be confirmed in other studies. The CVS approach in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is embraced by virtually all Dutch surgeons. The course of action when CVS is not obtained varies. IOC seems to be an endangered skill as over half the Dutch surgeons never perform it and the rest perform it only incidentally.
引用
收藏
页码:1235 / 1241
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
Treatment of bile duct lesions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Bergman, JJGHM ;
vandenBrink, GR ;
Rauws, EAJ ;
deWit, L ;
Obertop, H ;
Huibregtse, K ;
Tytgat, GNJ ;
Gouma, DJ .
GUT, 1996, 38 (01) :141-147
[2]
Booij Klaske A C, 2009, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V153, pA296
[3]
Avoiding biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: technical considerations [J].
Callery, M. P. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 20 (11) :1654-1658
[4]
Impact of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy on quality of life: a longitudinal study after multidisciplinary treatment [J].
de Reuver, P. R. ;
Sprangers, M. A. G. ;
Rauws, E. A. J. ;
Lameris, J. S. ;
Busch, O. R. ;
van Gulik, T. M. ;
Gouma, D. J. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 40 (08) :637-643
[5]
Litigation after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: An evaluation of the dutch arbitration system for medical malpractice [J].
de Reuver, Philip R. ;
Wind, Jan ;
Cremers, Jan E. ;
Busch, Olivier R. ;
van Gulik, Thomas M. ;
Gouma, Dirk J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 206 (02) :328-334
[6]
Survival in bile duct injury patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multidisciplinary approach of gastroenterologists, radiologists, and surgeons [J].
de Reuver, Philip R. ;
Rauws, Erik A. ;
Bruno, Marco J. ;
Lameris, Johan S. ;
Busch, Olivier R. ;
van Gulik, Thomas M. ;
Gouma, Dirk J. .
SURGERY, 2007, 142 (01) :1-9
[7]
Elakkary Ehab, 2006, JSLS, V10, P514
[8]
Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy [J].
Flum, DR ;
Dellinger, EP ;
Cheadle, A ;
Chan, L ;
Koepsell, T .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (13) :1639-1644
[9]
Surgeon experience and trends in intraoperative complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Hobbs, M. S. ;
Mai, Q. ;
Knuiman, M. W. ;
Fletcher, D. R. ;
Ridout, S. C. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (07) :844-853
[10]
Inspectie voor de Gezondheidzorg (IGZ), 2007, RES COUNTS