A Bayesian network model for integrative river rehabilitation planning and management

被引:20
作者
Borsuk, Mark E.
Schweizer, Steffen
Reichert, Peter
机构
[1] Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf
[2] Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
[3] Kraftwerke Oberhasli AG, Meiringen
[4] ETH Zürich, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich
关键词
Bayesian network; Decision support system; Integrative modeling; River rehabilitation; Uncertainty analysis;
D O I
10.1002/ieam.233
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As rehabilitation of previously channelized rivers becomes more common worldwide, flexible integrative modeling tools are needed to help predict the morphological, hydraulic, economic, and ecological consequences of the rehabilitation activities. Such predictions can provide the basis for planning and long-term management efforts that attempt to balance the diverse interests of river system stakeholders. We have previously reported on a variety of modeling methods and decision support concepts that can assist with various aspects of the river rehabilitation process. Here, we bring all of these tools together into a probability network model that links management actions, through morphological and hydraulic changes, to the ultimate ecological and economic consequences. Although our model uses a causal graph representation common to Bayesian networks, we do not limit ourselves to discrete-valued nodes or conditional Gaussian distributions as required by most Bayesian network implementations. This precludes us from carrying out easy probabilistic inference but gives us the advantages of functional and distributional flexibility and enhanced predictive accuracy, which we believe to be more important in most environmental management applications. We exemplify model application to a large, recently completed rehabilitation project in Switzerland. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2012; 8: 462472. (c) SETAC
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 472
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Allan J., 1995, Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters
[2]  
Amt fur Umwelt KantonThurgau, 1999, THUR UNB GROSS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, CAUSE CORRELATION BI, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511605949
[4]  
Blair P.D, 2009, INPUT OUTPUT ANAL FD
[5]   Logistic analysis of channel pattern thresholds: meandering, braiding, and incising [J].
Bledsoe, BP ;
Watson, CC .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2001, 38 (3-4) :281-300
[6]   Assessing the decline of brown trout (Salmo trutta) in Swiss rivers using a Bayesian probability network [J].
Borsuk, ME ;
Reichert, P ;
Peter, A ;
Schager, E ;
Burkhardt-Holm, P .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2006, 192 (1-2) :224-244
[7]   A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis [J].
Borsuk, ME ;
Stow, CA ;
Reckhow, KH .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2004, 173 (2-3) :219-239
[8]   Restoration strategies for river floodplains along large lowland rivers in Europe [J].
Buijse, AD ;
Coops, H ;
Staras, M ;
Jans, LH ;
Van Geest, GJ ;
Grift, RE ;
Ibelings, BW ;
Oosterberg, W ;
Roozen, FCJM .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (04) :889-907
[9]  
da Silva A. M. F., 1991, THESIS QUEENS U
[10]   Effects of Natural-Channel-Design Restoration on Habitat Quality in Catskill Mountain Streams, New York [J].
Ernst, Anne G. ;
Baldigo, Barry P. ;
Mulvihill, Christiane I. ;
Vian, Mark .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY, 2010, 139 (02) :468-482